English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Is there a word/term that relates to those? Usage examples of the words in the title:
Use of this mystery word/term in a sentence:
Is it necessary to include
____s, like American and Canadian, in aeroplane model names if they're all manufactured similarly?
Thanks!
You've used the single-word-request tag, but no such single word may exist. Demonyms are usually nouns, but most have corresponding adjectival forms. You might therefore call these words "adjectives derived from demonyms" (or "from country names" or "from geographical regions").
They are country adjectives in the examples 'Turkish cuisine', 'American passport', 'Canadian insignia' etc. as the adjectives refer to the country, not people. A country adjective differs from a demonym which only denotes a person (or people) who is an inhabitant of or native to a particular place. Demonyms are not only formed from country names but also city names or any other relevant geographical location. (E.g. Halifax -> Haligonian, Hispania -> Hispanic).
The singular form of demonyms can be the same as the country adjective but they can differ also. For example:
America --> American (the country adjective and the singular demonym are the same)
Iceland --> Icelandic (country adjective)
Iceland --> Icelander (demonym)
A country adjective describes something as being from that country, for example, "Italian cuisine" is "cuisine of Italy". A country demonym denotes the people or the inhabitants of or from there, for example, "Germans" are people of or from Germany. Note: Demonyms are given in plural forms. Singular forms simply remove the final s or, in the case of -ese endings, are the same as the plural forms. - Wikipedia
These are demonymic adjectives, sometimes also called gentilic adjectives (there isn't much difference between the two terms other than that the first is Greek, and the second Latin).
The corresponding nouns are demonyms.
In many cases the demonym is derived from the name of a country in one of a handful of ways (e.g. -ian in Canadian, -ic in Icelandic, -ese in Chinese, etc). In some others the country name is derived from the noun for a person of that ethnicity/nationality instead (e.g. Finland < Finn, Germany < German, Czechia < Czech). In the former case the noun for a person of that ethnicity/nationality is usually identical to the adjective (although in some cases using it is perceived as offensive), whereas in the latter case it is used to derive the adjective (e.g. Finnish < Finn, English < England, Polish < Pole).
In some cases there are also two competing adjectives (which may potentially also be used as nouns), with one derived from the demonym and one from the country name (e.g. Slovene vs Slovenian, Slovak vs Slovakian, Serb vs Serbian). In these cases the former usually describes ethnic identity, whilst the latter usually describes nationality or residence (e.g. a Slovenian Serb is an ethnic Serb with Slovenian nationality or residence).
Related terms are:
Another term for this is ethnonym, “The name of an ethnic group.”
A term used by the group to refer to itself is an endonym, and one used only by outsiders is an exonym. For example, English-speakers use the exonym Dutch for the people of the Netherlands, while Germans use the endonym Deutsch for themselves.
How about going another way about it?
I mean, is it necessary to include ORIGIN ... would work. Also a name for places is a TOPOnym. But origin encompasses more - meaning place of origin, country, but also in a more general sense producer, firm responsible for the article etc. Or you can go off the deep end and say is it necessary to add QUALIFIERS, such as... - here qualifier denotes a large class of specific descriptors, and the proper meaning is clarified by the provided examples : Turkish etc.
