22

I've been looking around the Internet. Some websites say that foods is incorrect but others say it is correct.

Improve this question
1
  • 1
    Hi, Matt_K. I voted to close this question as "general reference" because as it is written, I think you can find a good answer in a dictionary such as Wiktionary or OALD. You can learn more in our FAQ, including why some questions are closed, as well as find out how to ask questions here! – aedia λ Feb 17 '12 at 17:52
25

Food in its commonest sense is a non-countable noun, with all the effects of that. It's already a plural. You would eat "some food" not "a food". You would say "less food" not "fewer foods".

However, there is a less common usage where "a food" means "a type of food":

"Cheese is a food made from milk"

... and in this form, you can pluralise it ...

"Italy is the source of many delicious foods -- pizza, pasta, salami, biscotti..."

For comparison, think of "a people" - Are there meta-plurals beyond "peoples"?

Improve this answer
3
  • 2
    I had a fancy for starting posts and comments with "Peeps," wherever such lingo was tolerated. "Peoples!" doesn't have quite the same ring to it. – Kris Feb 17 '12 at 10:52
  • Thanks, which means when we are talking about multiple different number of food, we can use foods? – Matt_K Feb 18 '12 at 3:32
  • 1
    Food is not plural! The first paragraph in this answer makes no sense and is highly misleading. Yes, food is usually non-count, and that’s why we say ‘some food’ instead of ‘a food’. But it’s quite unambiguously singular, which is exactly why we say ‘less food’ and not ‘fewer food’. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Jan 29 '18 at 18:50
1

Kraft Foods ... Lots of byspels of the plural for foods. It's common and correct.

Improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.