0

As you might know Lionel Messi left FC Barcelona a few months ago.

A few months later and right now I'm discussing his departure with my friend. My friend asks:

Why didn't the club renew Messi's contract?

I'm like:

They didn't have the money to do so. Messi leaving Barcelona was inevitable. Thats why he left. Beside, he is 34 and too old for a football player. He would have to/would have had to leave sooner or later (he left a couple of mounths ago and we both know that)

Would have to or would have had to? Which one is grammatically correct?

What if I said "in 2 years" instead of "sooner or later"? Should I use would have to or would have had to?

1 Answer 1

1

As you were talking about a hypothetical situation that, if it had arisen, would have arisen in the past you should have used the past perfect tense "...would have had to leave...".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.