1

Gestalt, as defined by Lexico, is "an organized whole that is perceived as more than the sum of its parts." Is there a word that effectively conveys the opposite, that is, a whole being less than the sum of its parts?

EDIT (1): A potential example may be a large and varied range of overlapping sounds that itself forms a discordant sound, e.g. a variety of instruments played out of rythm.

EDIT (2): Another example may be a 'complete' square, or diamond in this case, formed from two "criss-crosses"(X's), the top and bottom diagonals of which meet one another. Think an individual square of a 'square mesh'. However this square doesn't have clean edges, there still being 2 small projecting lines at each vertice. Think a noughts and crosses board with significantly truncated lines directed out from the square, such that they are too small to be noticed. In this case a square is recognized, however the projecting lines are not, in which case it may be considered less than the sum of its parts.

1
  • I can’t help with the overall answer, but there is a precise word which captures your “EDIT (1)”: cacophany.
    – Dan Bron
    Dec 3, 2021 at 14:39

1 Answer 1

1

It is not quite parallel to describe the absence of something, the absence of Gestalt. or perhaps there are too many ways in which a work of art or a city or an event can fail to provide a unified vision or focus. gertrude Stein famously said on 0akland “There’s no there there.” Unfocused, unsure of itself, in the extreme a hot mess, incoherent in plan or purpose.

But this suggests that neighborhoods, events, art works should have a focus, but perhaps not. some may provide a steady background for the rest of life. There may than be no single Gestalt and especially no absence of a Gestalt that works, no single answer.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.