1

I was having a shower when the telephone rang. (Past Continuous for interrupted action) I was in the shower when the telephone rang.

Why is Past Simple used in the second sentence?)

3
  • It seems reasonable. "I was taking a shower" describes my state of being when the phone rang; so does "I was in the shower." What would the alternative be? "I was being in the shower" would be just extra words and clunky.
    – Maverick
    Oct 25, 2021 at 13:38
  • Progressive constructions require semantically active verbs like take a shower. Locative predicates are stative, not active, and therefore don't allow the progressive. This is in fact one of the tests for active vs stative predicates: I am renting that house (rent is active) vs *I am owning that house, which is ungrammatical because own is stative. Oct 25, 2021 at 17:21
  • 1
    Oh, just looked at the actual question. The second sentence is not progressive because the phone ringing is a punctual event, not a durative one. Durative events like showering take some time to accomplish, and hence are fine with the progressive. But if you use a punctual verb with the progressive (e.g, the phone was ringing), you give the impression that it went on for a long time and that other things were going on hurriedly at the same time. Nov 24, 2021 at 17:12

1 Answer 1

2

Here is a good explanation of why the progressive can't be used; it is found in A comprehensive grammar of the English language. It must be understood first that the verb "to be" in the sentence is a so called stative verb.

(CoGEL § 4.26) State, event, and habit with the progressive

The three verb senses of state, event, and habit are differently interpreted with the progressive :
(a) STATE PROGRESSIVE
In many cases the progressive is unacceptable with stative verbs:
♦ We own a house in the country.
♦ *We are owning a house in the country.
♦ *Sam's wife was being well-dressed.
This can be explained, in part, by the observation that stative verb meanings are inimical to the idea that some phenomenon is 'in progress'. States are 'like-parted' in that every segment of a state has the same character as any other segment: no progress is made. (Contrast We are building a house in the country.) Where the progressive does occur, it is felt to imply temporariness rather than permanence:
♦ We are living in the country. [temporary residence]
♦ We live in the country. [permanent residence]

1
  • Agree with this answer 100%.
    – meepyer
    Nov 25, 2021 at 6:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.