Melville's usage of dash and semicolon in Moby Dick [duplicate]

Question

As a non-native speaker of the English language, and to some extent a non-avid reader of English novels, I don't quite understand why Melville is using semicolons and dashes as he does in the following passage of Moby Dick:

Besides, passengers get sea-sick—grow quarrelsome—don't sleep of nights—do not enjoy themselves as much, as a general thing;—no, I never go as a passenger; nor though I am something of a salt, do I ever go to sea as a Commodore, or a Captain, or a Cook.

Specifically,

1. is it an artistic choice to use the semicolons instead of full stops? Wouldn't

   [...]I never go as a passenger. Nor though I am something of salt,...

   work as well?

2. Why use dashes after the semicolon? To my knowledge dashes are a great way to express another related thought in middle or at the end of a sentence. Therefore the syntax ;— feels a bit alien to me.

Answer 1

This is basically a question you could ask on Literature SE, but what it looks like is a literary technique called stream of consciousness.

Wikipedia defines it as

a metaphor describing how thoughts seem to flow through the conscious mind (i.e. without interruptions). In literature, stream of consciousness writing is a literary device which seeks to portray an individual's point of view by giving the written equivalent of the character's thought processes, either in a loose interior monologue, or in connection to his or her sensory reactions to external occurrences.

This site says:

Melville invents stream of consciousness with Stubb, although James Joyce and Virginia Woolf will get the credit.

This is connected to the English language first because although it is now a universal literary device, it was coined by English native authors, and second, in the sense of how this fluidity is marked in writing [* _{additions in square brackets by me}]:

To represent the full richness, speed, and subtlety of the mind at work, the writer incorporates snatches of incoherent thought [which looks like the phrases in between the em dashes in your excerpt], ungrammatical constructions [don't sleep of nights looks like one], and free association of ideas, images, and words at the pre-speech level. (Britannica)

The stream of consciousness technique becomes obvious in syntax and grammar:

Stream of consciousness writing does not usually follow ordinary rules of grammar and syntax (or word order). This is because thoughts are often not fully formed, or they change course in the middle and become "run-on sentences," or they are interrupted by another thought [interruptions can be indicated through the punctuation that puzzled you]. So grammar and syntax can be used to replicate this process in ways that aren't grammatically or syntactically "correct", but that nonetheless feel accurate. Additionally, writers of stream of consciousness often use punctuation in unconventional ways (using italics, ellipses, dashes, and line breaks to indicate pauses and shifts in the character's train of thought). (Litcharts.com)

Of course, it takes artistry to use grammatical and syntactical "incorrectness" in a way that "nonetheless feels accurate".