0

DO1 (v.tr.) 1c. To perform the tasks or behaviors typically associated with (something), especially as part of one's character or normal duties:

That talk show host just doesn't do subtle.

https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=do

Is subtle an adverb here? Or rather do is a copulative verb?

3
  • 1
    '[I don't] do + adjective/noun (other than ing-form)' is a snowclone. It is always idiomatic, often needing a lengthy paraphrase. Related: What does the phrase 'I don't do X' mean? (see Xanne's final paragraph). May 18 at 16:21
  • It seems similar to "play"+adjective or "act"+adjective ("play dumb", "act stupid", etc.) Although you can also use a similar construction with a noun object ("I don't do hospitals" is mentioned in the question linked above), as indeed you can do with "play" and "act" ("play the fool", etc).
    – Stuart F
    May 18 at 16:39
  • @StuartF Only act/play the fool is an idiom oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/…
    – GJC
    May 18 at 16:57
1

No . I do not know who first used this locution, but it is relatively recent. It is meant to jar on the ear as a way of grabbing attention. t is not a common mannerism used in talking about someone's personal or professional deficiencies.

So the adjective is being used a noun object of 'do'. In your example, the speaker is saying that the person in question entirely lacks subtlety in what s/he says. S/he is probably completely tactless and doesn't 'do tact' either.

You can view it, in its origins, at least, as a sort of figurative usage of the verb 'do'. But it has always had this stretched potential. We might speak of somebody coming in to do the carpets, where what is meant is that s/he is a carpet cleaner. Margaret Thatcher said that she thought it would be possible to "do business" with President Gorbachev. So the feature you are asking about is no more than an extension of an already established freedom.

For some reason this usage has not managed to sneak into the Cambridge online Dictionary. But Collins does idiom (which is getting closer to your example) much more fully.

  1. VERB You can use do to say that you are able or unable to behave in a particular way. [informal] 'Can't you be nicer to your sister?'—'Nice? I don't do nice'. [VERB adjective]

It describes the usage as "informal", no doubt because it is hard otherwise to account for the use of an adjective as the object of a transitive verb. In fact, though, there is a precedent for it in ancient Greek and Latin, where the neuter form of adjectives could stand for nouns. English schoolboys would think of this a implying an unspoken noun which the adjective qualified. So our first attempts at translation would be: "I don't do a nice thing (or things of the neuter plural was used)" So it there is no reason why it could not be used poetically or rhetorically for emphasis or effect. I could even imagine a letter of application from an extremely confident applicant trying to make an impression in that way, despite the risk of irritating the old buffer that might be reading it.

5
  • DO (verb) oed.com/oed2/00067961
    – GJC
    May 19 at 9:34
  • 'So the feature you are asking about is no more than an extension of an already established freedom.' But 'subtle', 'nice' etc are adjectives. 'Crosswords', 'business', 'the washing up' ... are nouns/NPs, the sort of thing expected after a verb. 'He did business with ...' is a typical delexical verb usage (as with 'take a bath/photograph ...', 'have a look/try ...') It's an enormous extension. // However, I can't find an exact duplicate anywhere, and though 'I don't do ADJ' has already been mentioned, that thread doesn't give dictionary support. May 19 at 10:30
  • Are you saying that the the use of 'do + adjective' is not now widely enough established to warrant its citation by Collins in its definition 16? Or are you saying that My own suggestion that it is no longer just 'informal' (whatever that means? Or are you saying that the fact that Greek (even modern Greek) I believe) can treat adjectives as virtual nouns is not a legitimate analogy because gender and case make all the difference?
    – Tuffy
    May 19 at 10:49
  • Actually it is a common way to talk about your personal deficiencies, at least in the US. May 23 at 22:24
  • @FeliniusRex And in the U.K.
    – Tuffy
    May 23 at 22:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.