Could you please help me to understand the context of these three phrases and where they can be used?

  1. I was not directly involved with ...
  2. I had not directly involved with ...
  3. I did not directly involve with ...

I get #2 & #3 in tenses timeline. However, I get confused when reading #1. Is it Passive? The crazy thing is I am using #1 frequently in speaking, when I am writing something I get confused myself about what I am writing?

  • (1) is correct - see this . The others are not. The past tense would be "I had not been directly involved". (3) would nave to be "I did not directly involve myself with..." – Kate Bunting Apr 2 at 8:01

You are correct, #1 is the only one that is in a passive voice.

As it's currently written, sentence 2 isn't quite grammatically correct. "I had not directly involved X with/in...," where X is the direct object, would be the grammatically correct form in active voice. In active voice, you become the doer, the one actively getting involved, and the object of the sentence is the receiver, with which you are getting involved.

This sentence can become passive if you change it to read "I had not been directly involved..." This makes you the receiver and the other entity as the doer, actively instigating and/or controlling your involvement.

This can completely change the meaning of the sentence depending on the context and what is being described. "I had not directly involved myself in the robbery" vs "I had not been directly involved with the robbery" imply different degrees of culpability.

Sentence 3, on the other hand, cannot be made into a passive statement simply by adding a verb. You also have to change the intransitive verb to a direct object. "I did not become directly involved with [it]," and, "I did not directly involve [them]," are both still active whereas, "I did not have direct involvement with [it]," is passive. Unlike #2, however, this has very little impact on the meaning of the sentence.

Breaking those sentence structures down, we can see that the only difference is in whether it employs an intransitive verb or a direct object. The effect of this being that 3a is in past perfect tense while 3b and 3c are both in past simple tense.

   N    V  Adv     V        Adv       Vi
3a I | did not | become | directly involved...

   N    V  Adv    V       Adj      DO
3b I | did not | have | direct involvement...

   N    V  Adv     Adv       V        DO
3c I | did not | directly involve | [them].
  • Thank you very much. If you don’t mind, may I know which program you used to structure those sentences? – Dendrobium Apr 2 at 13:40
  • 1
    I used CMU's Link Parser (and LOTS of googling to get my rusty grammar gears moving again) to identify the sentence constituents. link.cs.cmu.edu/link/submit-sentence-4.html – helium2s1 Apr 6 at 23:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.