The "O" in all these words represents a different vowel:

  • Harmony → /ˈhɑː.mə.ni/
  • Harmonic → /hɑːˈmɒn.ɪk/
  • Harmonious → /hɑːˈməʊ.ni.əs/

(UK pronunciations from Cambridge Dictionary)

I know that stress varies in all these words. In "harmony", the first syllable is stressed. When "harmony" becomes "harmonic", the stress moves to the second syllable and makes the vowel different. But both "harmonic" and "harmonious" are stressed on the second syllable, but the vowel in both words is different.

I can't find anything on Google and their etymologies don't suggest anything helpful. That is, my research didn't turn up anything useful.

Why do "harmonic" and "harmonious" have different vowels for the letter "O"?

  • The sound of vowels typically varies dependent on the letters that follow. Nothing unusual with "harmony" and it's kin.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Jan 17, 2021 at 13:31
  • 2
    @HotLicks: How? Can you explain? Commented Jan 17, 2021 at 14:09
  • @DecapitatedSoul Well, there's open and closed syllables for starters.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Jan 17, 2021 at 14:27
  • 1
    @DecapitatedSoul - Basically, English speakers are lazy. It's easier to say "har-mon-ic" than it is to say "har-mo-nic".
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Jan 17, 2021 at 14:39
  • 1
    But that means it's easier to say harm-ah-nious than harm-oh-nious. That's the trouble with explanations that rely on ease. It's arbitrary rules all the way. You can kind of understand why unstressed vowels are reduced to schwa, because English is stress-timed. So 1 is normal. I frankly don't know why the vowel is round in 3 but not in 2, though I bet somebody here does. And by the way, this is not about "letters"; this is about sounds. Spelling is irrelevant. Commented Jan 17, 2021 at 19:21

1 Answer 1


Just as there are patterns to the stress of words ending in the suffixes -ic and -ious (the stress regularly falls on the immediately preceding syllable for either suffix), there are patterns to the "length" of a single vowel letter before a single consonant letter.

The patterns for vowel length have many more exceptions than the patterns for stress, though, and it's unclear to what extent English speakers productively apply vowel length alternation rules.

The concept of open and closed syllables is not relevant: it would be circular to say that harmonic has a short vowel in the second syllable because the syllable is closed, since the only reason that syllable would ever be analyzed as closed is because it has a short vowel.

Spelling is probably relevant, unless you make certain strange assumptions (which some linguists do, but which is not an obvious choice!) about the reality of double/long/geminate consonants in the English sound system. We find a "long vowel" in proscenium, selenium but not in millennium: since all of these words are usually described as ending in the same sequence of phones, [niəm], you either have to explain the difference in the pronunciation of the stressed vowels in terms of spelling, leave it unexplained, or say that the difference is not based on spelling but based on a phonological contrast between /n/ and /nn/ in English that happens to line up with the spelling contrast and is realized not as a difference in the phonetic length of the consonant itself, but as a difference in the pronunciation of the preceding vowel (for more on this last approach, search for the term "virtual geminate").


Words ending in -ic regularly have a short vowel in the stressed syllable if it is written with a single vowel letter other than U, and followed by at least one consonant. A post where I describe this a bit more, and try to categorize the multiple exceptions: Which words have a long vowel before the suffix -ic?

The explanation for -ic's behavior isn't very clear. The Sound Pattern of English, by Chomsky and Halle, treats it as based on the behavior of -ical, which has two syllables. Vowels written with a single vowel letter and followed by at least one consonant sound are often short in stressed syllables when followed by two syllables or more (Chomsky and Halle treat this as a shortening or laxing process, "trisyllabic laxing", but I've seen other sources that prefer instead to analyze it as simply an absence of lengthening in this context).

There are some other suffixes or just endings written with the vowel letter I which also have a tendency to occur alongside a short vowel in the stressed stressed syllable: -id, verbal -ish (as in finish, cherish), possibly -it (as in deposit, credit).


Words ending in -ious regularly have a long vowel in the stressed syllable if it is written with a single vowel letter other than I, and followed by only one consonant letter. This is part of a more general rule that says that A E O U are long in a stressed syllable whenever the following letters are a single consonant letter (other than X), an E or I (not representing a stressed vowel), and then another vowel letter (so sequences like -eliu-, -olio-, -alea-, where e and a are not a digraph representing a single vowel sound). So suffixes or endings like -ial, -ian, -eous, -ean show the same pattern of long vowels in the stressed syllable (genial, Washingtonian, erroneous, subterranean).

I discuss this lengthening rule a bit in my post here: Why is "salient" pronounced with a "long a" sound? It seems to have originated from a vowel-lengthening sound change that occurred at some point in Middle English. However, the pattern applies to Latinate words in general, not just words that have been in English since Middle English. It seems a bit more consistent that the -ic short vowel rule but there are still plenty of exceptions, some difficult to explain.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.