0

Let's say that I am trying to prove a mathematical theorem. As part of that proof, I may want to introduce a construction that I will use repeatedly throughout the proof (and potentially combine many instantiations of the same construct). To that end, let's say that I name the construct Named Thing. I may say something like the following:

We will create a Named Thing. A Named Thing has the following structure etc.

Should Named Thing be capitalized in both cases here? It's used somewhat like a proper noun here, although it's referring to a class of objects, as opposed to referring to a single specific object from this class.

Furthermore, let's now consider the following sentence:

We construct named things for each of the five cases.

Here I believe it should be lower case, as its usage is (I believe) as a common noun. Is that correct?

3
  • 2
    In either cases using upper case sounds a little odd. If the name is new which will repeat, you can give a legend or a reference like (XYZ referred to as X else in this...).
    – Ram Pillai
    Jan 4, 2021 at 14:45
  • Thanks both, this is also my intuition actually. But a coauthor is using an alternative capitalization scheme (the one in the post), and I realized that I don't know how to justify my approach.
    – bassen
    Jan 4, 2021 at 15:08
  • 'Coauthor' hints at writing an academic paper. While 'how to introduce a new term' is essentially a matter of opinion (and opinions often differ), institutions usually make their preferences known in their in-house style guide (often different from nearby rivals'). Jan 4, 2021 at 17:10

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.