1

I am writing a dedication:

To my family, parents and mentors

Parents were also my family when I was a kid. Thus, may this "overlap" in the differents terms cause confusion?

A wordier option:

To my wife, children, parents and mentors

Less wordier option:

To my family and mentors

Or how to solve this?

1
  • 3
    Your parents are still part of your family, surely? Dec 29 '20 at 9:10
1

I would definitely go for "To my wife, children, parents and mentors". You honour them by naming every one of them, I wouldn't worry about wordiness. One consideration to take into account is:

Think not just about the person or people named in the book dedication, but also about all of the readers who will pass by this page and be impacted. Make a conscious choice about what you want that impact to be (if any). (Medium.com)

As for the technical term, some use immediate family, which

normally includes a person's parents, siblings, spouses, children, or an individual related by blood whose close association is an equivalent of a family relationship. (Wikipedia)

In law they also use the phrase close family member which includes:

the individual's spouse; the individual's and the spouse's grandparents, parents, siblings, children, nieces, nephews, aunts, uncles and first cousins; the spouse of any of these people; and any other individuals who share the same household with the Government Official. (Lawinsider) - includes too many.

There doesn't seem to exist a name which would include only your wife and children (and parents).

0

You could say generations.

"To generations of my family and mentors..." or, "To generations of 'Smiths', mentors, honored guests..."

I think it would border on insulting to split hairs and say, "To my immediate family, my parents, my mentors..."

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.