0

I am currently writing the literature review portion of my dissertation and I find that I am being quite wordy when attempting to describe what a layman would conceptualize as an "image". That is, an optical RGB image, for example a picture of a dog. Specifically in relation to other forms of electromagnetically sensed imagery like multispectral, infrared, and hyperspectral imagery.

Throughout my work I make the distinction that electromagnetic radiation collected by an imaging sensor produces imagery. That imagery can be of a specific type e.g. multispectral, infrared, hyperspectral, optical RGB, etc. But I also wish to refer to the common conceptualization of a "plain old picture image" that anyone would understand.

To do so I have found myself using the term "optical RGB" quite often, it's the only terminology that seems to describe "a plain old picture" in relation to the other forms of imagery described.

Is there a better term I could use in this context to switch between the corpus specific imagery and layman specific image?

Example of usage: "The surfeit of research in deep learning aimed at semantic segmentation of optical RGB images naturally lends itself in applications to hyperspectral imagery"

5
  • If you don't really need a single word, I suggest that you remove the SWR tag...it causes all sorts of issues here. Please see the criteria by hovering your cursor over the tag. Commented Dec 9, 2020 at 17:08
  • 1
    Indeed, and edit has been made.
    – KDecker
    Commented Dec 9, 2020 at 17:12
  • This isn't a question about English, but rather about technical jargon. There is no doubt another SE site where it would be more appropriate.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Dec 9, 2020 at 17:52
  • @HotLicks Could you suggest another home.SE for this Q? Commented Dec 9, 2020 at 18:01
  • 1
    One could try Physics or Photography.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Dec 9, 2020 at 18:06

2 Answers 2

4

Adding the acronym RGB doesn't help much. There are plenty of images to be found that are RGB but represent spectra we can't normally see with our unassisted eyes. Example The Horsehead Nebula in new light shows said system in the far infra-red, using RGB.

My suggestions

visible-spectrum images**

or

visible-light images**


** Of course, even these are vulnerable to criticism because different creatures see in different ranges of the spectrum. You need to make a definition of your term somewhere and then stick to it. Maybe define HVimages to mean human-vision-images.

2
  • This is the right answer.
    – Unrelated
    Commented Dec 9, 2020 at 18:36
  • Thank you, this is exactly what I was looking for.
    – KDecker
    Commented Dec 11, 2020 at 17:06
2

Dictionary definitions of visual relate to the seeing of something

relating to seeing

something such as a picture, photograph, or piece of film used to give a particular effect or to explain something

Cambridge dictionary

Definitions of optical relate to visual but also tend towards extra aspects relating to the use and science of light and optical science.

used in order to see something better

connected with the eyes or sight, or connected with or using light

Cambridge dictionary

of or relating to the science of optics

Merriam Webster

I therefore suggest that a layman would understand "visual image" as something to be seen with the eye, but that "optical image" would imply something about the technicalities of light, sight and optics (as does your own "optical RGB", which might even be incomprehensible to the lay person).

Furthermore, visual image is still reasonably defined within the wider spectrum of images that you are writing about so may not conflict with your technical text.

1
  • 1
    I add to my answer the opinion that making technical concepts (such as your concluding example) accessible to the intelligent layman is a worthy objective but may sometimes be almost impossible. The deconstruction of the specialist terms leads to a long chain (or, even worse, a network) of connection between simpler concepts. This means the end result is as opaque to the reader by virtue of the chain length as it was by the use of the specialist terms. Good Luck!
    – Anton
    Commented Dec 9, 2020 at 17:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.