1

What is the opposite of numerous? I expected the answer to be innumerous, but that seems to mean too many to count. There must be a negative to numerous that isn't simply few.

closed as general reference by user2683, TimLymington, FumbleFingers, Brendon, Kit Z. Fox Jan 19 '12 at 13:12

This question is too basic; it can be definitively and permanently answered by a single link to a standard internet reference source designed specifically to find that type of information. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Is there something wrong with not many? If so, please clarify; if not, this is general reference. – TimLymington Jan 19 '12 at 11:46
  • not many doesn't have the same force as numerous in the opposite direction. There may not be a strong enough antonym, though. – Kris Jan 19 '12 at 11:57
  • 1
    thesaurus.com/browse/few – RegDwigнt Jan 19 '12 at 11:57
2

In many contexts, one antonym is scarce or scant (2b : lacking in amplitude or quantity)

1

In the singular, you could use 'modicum' or 'trifle'/'trifling amount'.

1

In grammatical terminology, the word paucal is commonly used, but it's not common in other situations.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.