0

I have just read the following sentence, and It was difficult for me to understand what the author aimed to convey when she has used "rhetorical flab" in the sentence. I would be grateful if anybody helps me out to understand the meaning of this phrase.

"Yet far too many writers send their best ideas out into the world on brittle-boned sentences weighted down with rhetorical flab"

  • 2
    It's not an established idiom, but "flab" generally implies some useless weight. – Hot Licks Nov 14 at 19:30
  • 1
    To be flabby is to be weak and without force. – Michael Harvey Nov 14 at 19:42
  • 1
    'Brittle-boned sentences': not apparent, but analysis shows the real content of the writing is very questionable. 'Too much flag': an unhealthy attempt to disguise the former. – Edwin Ashworth Nov 14 at 19:56
  • 4
    @EdwinAshworth anyone with excess weight and osteoporosis (brittle bones) is at extra risk of fractures due to the skeleton not being strong enough to support the overweight body. I read the metaphor 'brittle-boned sentences weighed down with rhetorical flab' as meaning that the sentences, once the excess volubility is stripped away, are either poorly constructed or short on supporting facts. – BoldBen Nov 14 at 21:15
0

rhetorical: rhetorical speech or writing is intended to seem important or influence people

Cambridge dictionary

A slightly wider definition is:

rhetorical: A rhetorical question is not a question about the art of speaking effectively; it is a question that is asked for effect, rather than from a desire to know the answer. “Would it kill you to stop chewing your food with your mouth open?” is a rhetorical question.

Merriam webster

Flab = noun (informal, disapproving): soft, loose flesh on someone's body>

Cambridge dictionary

By analogy, flab is useless words, phrases or sentences in prose. It is not only useless but, like body flab, by the weight of its presence it imposes a burden on the understanding of the substance of the text.

We may understand rhetorical flab as unnecessary and burdensome content that is pretentious and tries to impress by mere form, convention or cliché rather than by content or meaning. It confuses and distracts from meaning.

When the basic message is simple or weak, we may describe it as brittle-boned, and therefore weakened rather than strengthened by the surrounding flab.

Here is an example from our own British prime minister: at one point in a speech he is uttering a simple and rather banal Covid message of "We are worried about jobs, businesses and the economy and we should plan to mitigate the effects", but he pads it with flab and says instead:

...and we know that people are worried now about their jobs and their businesses and we are waiting as if between the flash of lightning and the thunderclap with our hearts in our mouths for the full economic reverberations to appear and we must use this moment – now – this interval to plan our response and to fix of course the problems that were most brutally illuminated in that covid lightning flash"

gov.uk

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.