# Is an article required before a math variable?

Is the definite article required before a variable used to abbreviate a physical quantity?

The ft is the same for both cases at various values of the Lc. As the Lc increases, the fr also shifts.

ft is the same for both cases at various values of Lc. As Lc increases, fr also shifts.

If the second sentence is okay, I am still a bit weirded out by starting a sentence with a math notation.

(Lc = Length of the channel, ft = frequency of the transistor)

• You can put some padding in front, like "We see that ft is the same for both cases at various values of Lc. As Lc increases, fr also shifts." Commented Oct 18, 2020 at 17:24
• I'm not sure but I would get around the weirdness of it by saying "The value of the ft would change." It only puts off the answer but keeps away the discomfort. Commented Oct 18, 2020 at 17:25
• Usually the article is omitted. Commented Oct 18, 2020 at 18:20
• @HotLicks: In a maths context, I would say the article is always omitted. Commented Oct 19, 2020 at 11:32

This is answered by recognising that Lc and ft (or fr) are names, referring to the quantities "channel length" and "transistor frequency" (and whatever the other one is).

You could call "channel length" Cuthbert. A sentence referring to Cuthbert wouldn't use an article:

Fred is the same for both cases at various values of Cuthbert. As Cuthbert increases, Fred also shifts.

Don't use an article for the names/symbols for the quantities.

There's no weirdness in starting a sentence with a name, however it's spelled. If it doesn't have a capital letter, don't use one. It's unusual, because names usually have a capital letter and sentences should start with one. But changing ft into Ft could substantially change what you are referring to. That is far more important than stylistic custom concerning capital letters. However, many don't like this flouting of convention, in which case, it's necessary to use "The value of ft ..."

See also the ELU question Is it okay to start a sentence with a Greek letter (variable)?

If ft, fr and Lc have been defined previously, the second sentence is clear, unambiguous, conventional and correct.

In mathematical and physical discourse, a function of a variable may be represented as a symbol. For example, we have your ft , or f(t) as it might often be represented. The value f of the function depends on the value of the determining variable t. The symbol ft represents the manner in which the value f of the function depends on the determining variable t. Once defined the symbol is understood as the representation of the functional relationship between the two. It is therefore redundant to use "The" with such defined symbols, whether or not they occur at the start of the sentence.

The alphanumeric expression of the function is irrelevant, as is the number of determining variables. This argument applies to any function. For example F(t), ft, pb, Φx, Gamma(x,y,z),Phiμ.

It is correct usage to refer to the function f(t) in examples such as the following. In each case the function is being defined on its first use.

"Consider the function f(t)=t*t, where f has a quadratic dependence on t."

"The function sin(t) has a regular periodicity in t"

Here is accepted answer to Is it okay to start a sentence with a Greek letter (variable)?. Note that it is asking the opposite of your question.

• Maybe for Physical Review Style and Notation Guide (only if it didn't end with a symbol or number)
• Both Yes and No for the AMS A manual for authors of mathematical papers
• No, an article is required for Journals of the London Mathematical Society: house style and instructions for copy-editors and typesetters (BrE)

• No, an article is required for Chicago Manual of Style (AmE)

But you are asking about about starting with a (non-Greek) variable name. Both my undergrad professor, Jon Louis Bentley, and my senior editor at IBM, were adamantly opposed to starting with a variable.

In the absence of a clarifying style guide, I would agree with the "weirded out" impression and go with the CMoS, 13th ed., advice for numbers, substituting variables:

At the beginning of a sentence any number that would ordinarily be set in figures is spelled out, regardless of any inconsistency this may create. (Section 8.9)

If this is impracticable or cumbersome, the sentence should be recast so that it does not begin with a number. (Section 8.10)

While it may be acceptable (or your style guide may be mute) to start with a variable, recast the sentence so that it does not start with a variable.

• As a former maths teacher, I'd argue strongly against the use of articles with variables. In maths (and last I heard, not in physics and chemistry), y, f(x), m and so on are placeholders for the numerical values (known or unknown, or even variable) corresponding to measurements in given units. In f = ma, for instance, f is 20, not 20 newtons, when the force involved is 20 newtons. A pure number. No article. Commented Oct 19, 2020 at 18:44
• I think the question whether one can start an English sentence with a variable name, such as f (in contrast with rewriting so that English words precede the variable.) Using your example, I would rewrite "f = ma is Newton's equation expressing force in terms of mass and acceleration" to "Newton's equation expressing force in terms of mass and acceleration is f = ma." Commented Oct 19, 2020 at 20:26
• And I'd consider the rule of never starting a sentence with a non-capital letter useful (and recasting sentences is often the best option), but old-fashioned if over-prescribed. Fronting is a valuable emphasising tool. // That aside, my point was 'no articles for numerals / variables / operators such as sin, log is an absolute'. Commented Oct 20, 2020 at 16:39