0

If we say something like "More than two months have passed", would you say this is speaking in the Passive Voice? When you look at the general rules about when to use the Passive Voice, it doesn't seem to mention the passing of time, so I'm wondering why we say it this way.

4
  • In my opinion the only passive voice rule that matters is to remember that the other "rules" are actually only guidelines and mainly a matter of style rather than correctness. – nnnnnn Sep 11 '20 at 0:42
  • 3
    It's not the passive voice. – Robusto Sep 11 '20 at 0:57
  • 1
    The passive voice would use "are passed" not "have passed". – Walter Mitty Sep 11 '20 at 1:10
  • The metaphor of time being a river (and the simile "time like an ever-rolling stream") is applicable. I don't think there's a passive voice for flowing water either. – BoldBen Sep 11 '20 at 2:04
2

It is in the active voice because it is the months that passed.

To put it in the passive voice, it would have to use a form of "to be" as well, such as this:

More than two months were wasted.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.