English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
"Admit to stealing the money."
And
"Admit stealing the money."
A lot of people, including native speakers, have told me there is no difference between them. But for some reason the second example doesn't feel right to me. I would either use the first one or include a that clause and say "He admitted (that) he stole the money." Am I completely wrong?
In the case of actions, the two are interchangeable, at least in everyday conversation (possibly in formal writing it could be preferred to use "to").
But in the case of admitting facts, we can't use "to".
For example,
I admit [that] this color doesn't look good on me.
To use "to" we'd have to reword the admission to have a nominal form, such as,
I admit to this color not being my best.
