1

I've read this sentence in a book:

Like most languages, C# lets you define local variables, which are named elements inside a method that each hold a piece of information.

I can see this sentence in two ways, I can't get to know which one is the correct one:

  1. named is the adjective of elements. So nothing is named "elements inside a method"! it is just saying that variables are named elements (each element has a name) which are declared inside a method and hold a piece of information.
  2. are named is a passive verb, and the whole sentence means that variables are named "elements inside a method"

I myself think that the first one is correct, however I have to persuade someone who thinks the second one is correct. I don't know how to prove it.

Improve this question
6
  • Does this answer your question? verb or adjective in "The blue page is *stapled* to the red page"? – Edwin Ashworth Jul 20 '20 at 13:50
  • 3
    I'd say that 'named elements' is [attribute + referent] (cf 'landed gentry') and on the analysis I subscribe to, 'named' is an adjective (obviously a participial one, so strongly connoting verbiness). – Edwin Ashworth Jul 20 '20 at 13:53
  • I see "named" as a verb, not an adjective, because it has none of the distinctive properties of adjectives. For example, it can't be modified by "very" and it can't occur as complement to complex-intransitive verbs like "become" ("It became quite named") or complex-transitive verbs like "find" ("I found it quite named"). – BillJ Jul 20 '20 at 17:32
  • 1
    ... But then 'nuclear' would cause problems with these tests. Essentially, there are different schools here. – Edwin Ashworth Jul 20 '20 at 18:36
  • 1
    But there is no verb "nuclear", whereas there is a verb "name", hence the doubt about whether "named" is a participial adjective or a verb phrase. – BillJ Jul 20 '20 at 18:44
2

In theory, the sentence is ambiguous, and both readings 1) and 2) are possible. But the context makes it completely clear that 1) is the correct one here: local variables exist inside a method, and they are elements that have names.

To avoid this ambiguity, in case reading 2) was intended, the writer could have used quotation marks around elements: which are named 'elements'... This would have been advisable. But reading 2) was never intended, so it doesn't matter here.

Improve this answer
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.