0

Can a series of years be possessive? For example:

I am 1990s' child

This feels weird, but is it technically correct? And how about the following?

I am a child of the 1990s'

  • 1
    Genitive, not possessive. – Lawrence Jun 19 at 15:19
  • 1
    There should be no apostrophe in the second variant. And most Google hits on a search for "a sixties phenomenon" drop the apostrophe and use the plural attributive usage. – Edwin Ashworth Jun 19 at 15:22
  • @Lawrence There's a difference? – Mitch Jun 19 at 15:26
  • Yes, genitive can refer to close association that isn’t possessive. – Lawrence Jun 19 at 15:32
  • So could "I am a 90's child" be correct because it's genitive instead of possessive? – zarinficklin Jun 19 at 15:34
-3

I am 1990s' child (two errors)

I am a 1990's child. (the apostrophe here is not genitive, it indicates the plural)


I am a child of the 1990s' (one error)

I am a child of the 1990's (again the apostrophe indicates the plural)

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    Greengrocer's apostophe's are anathema. – Andrew Leach Jun 19 at 16:19
  • 1
    Apostophe's are not used for plural's. Writing 1990s is enough. – Andrew Leach Jun 19 at 16:42
  • 2
    It's not an abbreviation: it's a plural, and you have said so in your answer. And yes, I would use As and not A's in your sentence. – Andrew Leach Jun 19 at 17:52
  • 3
    In that case your answer is wrong because you explicitly say it's the plural, and it's not. – Andrew Leach Jun 19 at 17:56
  • 1
    I would use "lowercase As" as you suggested earlier. But this is irrelevant. Your own source contradicts your answer. – Andrew Leach Jun 19 at 18:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.