0

Recently, I posted a puzzle on Puzzling.SE.

The puzzle describes a prison containing thousands of hallways which all run next to each other, like the pipes in a pan flute. In my description of the prison, I wrote that most of the hallways have a door which leads to the adjacent hallway.

Someone wrote in the comments that my use of the word "the" is incorrect. After all, most of the hallways have two adjacent hallways, and so I can't write "the adjacent hallway"; I have to write "an adjacent hallway" or "one of the adjacent hallways".

However, I could swear that it's reasonably common in English to write things like "the adjacent room" and "the adjacent lot" even when there are multiple adjacent rooms and multiple adjacent lots, and no way for the reader to determine exactly which room or lot was meant.

I could very easily imagine someone saying "I was lecturing once when I heard a strange noise from the adjacent classroom", even when there are two adjacent classrooms; and "there are trees on the line between this lot and the adjacent lot", even when there are several adjacent lots. To me, if you replace "the" with "an" in either of those examples, it sounds bit like you're trying to draw the reader's attention to the existence of a new classroom or lot that they weren't aware of before.

Is my thinking correct? Is it really appropriate to write "the adjacent room" when there are several adjacent rooms, or am I just imagining things?

I'm interested primarily in whether or not "the" is actually used this way by careful writers, not in what textbooks for English students have to say about the matter.

  • 1
    Don't you think "reasonably common" mistakes are no justifcation for getting things wrong? If you want to be correct then no, you may not use "the adjacent hallway". You do need "an adjacent hallway" or "one of the adjacent hallways"… If you don't mind being seen as incorrect… or… uh… "wrong", use what words you wish… – Robbie Goodwin Jun 1 at 22:22
  • @RobbieGoodwin Of course I think that reasonably common mistakes are no justification for getting things wrong. I'm not asking if it's a reasonably common mistake; I'm asking if it's the way careful writers habitually write. – Tanner Swett Jun 1 at 22:29
  • Then why not do the research? Why not use any of the tools available through any search engine to show how all writers habitually write, then make your own conclusion about what careful writers do differently? Alternatively, why not drop the Question as broadly unanswerable? – Robbie Goodwin Jun 1 at 22:40
  • In any case, I've edited the question to make it more similar to other well-received [grammaticality] questions. I'm now simply asking "is this correct?" instead of explicitly asking what careful writers do. – Tanner Swett Jun 1 at 23:11
  • Sorry, although of course rules have exceptions, this ins't one of them. it's reasonably common in English to say "the adjacent (noun)" even when there are multiple adjacent (nouns) and no way for the reader to determine which is meant. Hopefully it's vastly less common to write that… the difference being that unless we're lazy, we give much more thought to what we write. Even it was an every-day mistake, it would still always and without exception be a mistake. If too few people care, it will become acceptable but happily, that hasn't yet happened. – Robbie Goodwin Jun 2 at 0:41
0

I've found several uses of the phrase "the adjacent room", in cases where there are multiple adjacent rooms and no way of identifying a particular one, in printed books from mainstream publishers.

Given these citations, I can only conclude that this usage is perfectly grammatical and correct.

All of these are from Google Books.

Jones, Thomas J. A. Professional Management of Housekeeping Operations. United Kingdom, Wiley, 2007, p. 216:

[...] engineer with a bolt cutter in preparation for cutting the chain on the door.

There are two specific exceptions to the concerns stated, both of which should be considered before using the emergency master key or the bolt cutter. The room may have been sold as part of a suite that adjoins the adjacent room.

Ermann, Michael. Architectural Acoustics Illustrated. United States, Wiley, 2015, p. 179:

Design rooms that are not noise sensitive as buffer zones between noisy spaces and quiet spaces. For instance, place a row of closets, utility rooms, vestibules, and bicycle storage rooms between residential units. Experience suggests that the room two-doors-down is much quieter than the adjacent room, so insert buffer rooms to effectively move noisy rooms “two doors down.”

Jellison, Judith. Including Everyone: Creating Music Classrooms Where All Children Learn. United States, Oxford University Press, 2015 (no page number):

We've also experienced times when we cannot concentrate on a task because of distracting sounds from others in the same room, from a malfunctioning heating or cooling system, or from musicians practicing in the adjacent room.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    "Given these citations, I can only conclude that this usage is perfectly grammatical." - But grammatical and semantically correct are not the same thing. It's possible to be grammatically correct but completely nonsensical. (Not that the examples you found are nonsensical, but "grammatical" is not the bar you need to clear here.) – nnnnnn Jul 18 at 2:35
  • @nnnnnn Yep, I suppose that's true. I changed it to say "grammatical and correct". – Tanner Swett Jul 18 at 3:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.