0

What do you call the action taking the output of a system (any system: a societal system, a mathematical operation, a recipe) and using it as an input?

I don't necessarily mean when output of a process is always used as its own input, like sourdough production or if a Marmite factory also produced beer. I do not mean that the output is necessarily something that always goes back in; I am meaning that such feedback is possible, neither excluded nor required.

Again, I'm referring to when this action can and does happen. For example: when a university student later teaches at or otherwise works for the same college he graduated from, when a function that takes in functions receives itself, when the fillings that fall from several tacos falling into a tortilla being used as a napkin in order to make one last taco; in general, where a hierarchy points at its own predecessor in a way that logic doesn't break.

I have seen "nepotistic" and "incestuous" used as pejorative metaphors, but these are only metaphors, and are not neutral. I am looking for either a single word or a phrase.

5
  • Uh, "normal". All "input" is an "output" from another system.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Apr 7, 2020 at 20:19
  • 1
    Sounds recursive to me, like algorithms that call themselves. (Don't say "Call them what?) Commented Apr 7, 2020 at 22:58
  • Your examples are not related in any clear way. They don't give any insight into what you want as a result.
    – R Mac
    Commented Apr 8, 2020 at 1:08
  • They are disparate but are doing the same thing: the "right" end of the diagram has an option to point back around to the front of the "left" end. Commented Apr 8, 2020 at 14:55
  • The current answer of feedback loop is good (as would be vicious circle), but it's unclear if you're talking about something that repeats and enhances itself (perhaps indefinitely) or something that only "uses an output as an input," which is something a little different. Both nepotistic and incestuous have a kind of recursive quality—although recursion implies, although doesn't necessitate, multiple repetition. However, not only do the first two paragraphs in your question contradict each other, but it's not clear if the output and the input need to be related to the same thing. Commented Apr 15, 2020 at 20:32

1 Answer 1

3

Very generally, a system like this can be described as a feedback system/loop, where the output of the system is fed back as an input to the system. The classic example is audio feedback, which occurs when you hold a microphone near a speaker - minor noises are picked up by the mic and amplified by the speaker, which is then picked up by the mic again, and amplified even more, until you have an ear-splitting ring after a short time.

Your examples seem more focused on productive use of otherwise useless byproducts, though, rather than feeding system output back in as input. You can use the byproduct of beer brewing to produce Marmite, but you don't directly use the product/byproduct of beer brewing to brew more beer, so it's not exactly a feedback loop.

1
  • You can use the yeast cake (yeast that settles to the bottom of a container of fermenting beer) from one batch as the source of yeast for the next batch. Before people knew that yeast was a microorganism, this was often how beers were fermented.
    – The Photon
    Commented Apr 7, 2020 at 22:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.