0

I understand that “that” is used for restrictive clauses, and that “which” is used for nonrestrictive clauses. However, I’m unsure if the placement of “which” in a nonrestrictive clause changes the rules that govern it. Specifically, if “which” is not the first word after a comma, does it alter the rules of the clause in any way? For instance:

Henry was a mechanic, a job which requires a keen eye.

I understand that “… a job…” can be removed and the sentence rewritten. However, is it correct in its present form? Or should “which” be replaced with “that”?

  • 3
    Does this answer your question? When to use “that” and when to use “which”? – Edwin Ashworth Apr 2 at 10:42
  • You won't encounter it so often nowadays, but Henry was a mechanic, which job requires a keen eye is still "syntactically valid" to me. – FumbleFingers Apr 2 at 11:13
  • 1
    It is the first word following its antecedent. "A job which requires a keen eye" is a separate constituent, an ascriptive noun phrase (not an appositive one) serving as a supplement. It's within this NP supplement that the relative clause "that/which requires a keen eye" modifies "job". – BillJ Apr 2 at 11:18
  • I don't think we have a question of correcting the "which" to that here (I would.) It looks like the question is whether the word which defines the clause as non-restrictive just for showing up (it doesn't) and modifying "mechanic" (it doesn't.) – Yosef Baskin Apr 14 at 16:53
-1

The answer is "No, but it is probably commoner to use "which" in non-restrictive (descriptive) clauses and "that" in restrictive (defining) clauses." (I notice that American English seems to do this more often than British English.)

Non-restrictive (descriptive) clauses should be offset by commas; restrictive (defining) clauses are not. However a job is in apposition to “a mechanic” and is merely descriptive. (This is creates a strange, but grammatical, sentence as everyone knows that being a mechanic is a job.)

Your sentence has several forms:

Henry was a mechanic.

Henry was a mechanic, a job. (A job is in non-restrictive apposition to “mechanic” and the comma is necessary.)

Henry was a mechanic, a job,[note the comma] which requires a keen eye. (A job is still in non-restrictive apposition to “mechanic”* but “which requires a keen eye* now qualifies “mechanic” although it is unclear because of a lack of context as to whether the clause is restrictive or non-restrictive.)

Henry was a mechanic, a job that requires a keen eye. that requires a keen eye is a restrictive clause and “a job that requires a keen eye” is a noun phrase in apposition to "mechanic".

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    If whoever voted this down would explain why, I would be grateful. – Greybeard Apr 2 at 14:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.