English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
We are writing a book about an amateur dramatic group called 'Richmond Players'. The title is "The Richmond Players Story". There is a hot debate in the group about whether a possessive apostrophe is needed after "Players". One school of the thought is that one is not needed because of the inclusion of "The".
Thoughts?
The templates for the two constructions you are asking about look like this:
So "The Richmond Players' Story" breaks down as "[The Richmond Players]' Story" meaning "the story of [the Richmond Players]."
To tell whether this is correct, we need to know more about how the name of your group, "Richmond Players,"is used.
Some proper nouns in English are used with a definite article (sometimes thought of as being part of the name, and sometimes not), while others aren't. Baseball team names are an example of proper nouns used with a definite article: people say things like "the Houston Astros." If your name is like this, and you can be called "the Richmond Players" (e.g. in phrases like "brought to you by the Richmond Players") then "The Richmond Players' Story" would be a correct way to phrase this (even if it is not the only option).
If the group is never referred to as "the Richmond Players"—that is, if you say things like "brought to you by Richmond Players"—you would instead say "Richmond Players' Story" when using a genitive apostrophe.
"The Richmond Players Story" breaks down as "The [Richmond Players] Story" meaning something like "The story about/of the type [Richmond Players]."
This structure can be used either with a proper noun that does not take a definite article, or a proper noun that does take a definite article. In the later case, you usually don't double up on the definite article. Examples:
I agree with the argument that you do not need to use an apostrophe: you can say "The Richmond Players Story" if you are using the construction described in this section.
Is it the story of the group called "The Richmond Players", or the story of the Players themselves?
If the latter, then it definitely needs to be "The Richmond Players' Story".
If the former, then "The Richmond Players Story" differentiates it, and it can be justified as using "The Richmond Players" attributively. That doesn't mean that the version with the apostrophe cannot be used for "the story of the group", but it could be ambiguous.
Similarly for the example in comments:
The Mary Smith Story: the story about Mary Smith; Mary Smith's Story is more personal.
