2

An ESL student of mine wrote:

If they don't act quickly, it's possible that new diseases appear.

I could mark it as 'off style' on the grounds that [will] is the usual tense for said verb but I would like a deeper explanation -both for my student and myself- so I started wondering about the grammaticality of the whole construction.

Here's what I have so far: if [appear] has either present indicative or subjunctive features, it's at least ambiguous. The if-clause, however, seems to me to preclude the simple present (present indicative), which expresses habituality or fact, and require a 'dynamic' form instead, which is accomplished by [will]. But what if it's subjunctive? Would it be ungrammatical, and why? If grammatical, would there be a difference in meaning with respect to [will appear]?

Improve this question
14
  • 1
    No. That usage is no longer colloquial, and in any situation involving public health non-colloquial language could cause confusion and should be avoided.
    – John Lawler
    Commented Mar 4, 2020 at 22:57
  • 2
    "could" would be a better fit that "will" since the whole thing is uncertain.
    – Matthew Smith
    Commented Mar 5, 2020 at 0:00
  • I'm not so sure about this statement of yours: "The if-clause, however, seems to me to preclude the simple present (present indicative), which expresses habituality or fact, and require a 'dynamic' form instead, which is accomplished by [will]." For example, you can say If we don't stop this new disease, we all die as well as If we don't stop this new disease, we will all die.
    – JK2
    Commented Mar 5, 2020 at 2:53
  • @JohnLawler that is what I meant by "off style". But would you say it is ungrammatical? What would its interpretation have been back when it was colloquial?
    – Mau
    Commented Mar 5, 2020 at 3:10
  • 1
    @Mau And here's an attested example albeit rare: If he tests well, it's possible that he leapfrogs himself into round one conversation. 247sports.com/nfl/chicago-bears/ContentGallery/…
    – JK2
    Commented Mar 5, 2020 at 4:20

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

I'm no expert, but isn't it just because the sentence requires the Simple Future tense of 'Appear'. [Will|would|could|might] appear (in the future).

Improve this answer
1
  • Can you consider it with a singular subject? "If they don't act quickly, it's possible that a new disease VERB" [appears] I think is blocked by its subordinate status (relative to [possible]) and its conjuction to [if they don't act] [appear] sounds off-style, non-colloquial, maybe archaic or pompous but I can't say it's ungrammatical. What do you think?
    – Mau
    Commented Mar 5, 2020 at 3:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.