"But (something) instead" versus "but instead (something)"

Question

Please consider the sentences:

They do not overpower the city, but empower it instead.

They do not overpower the city, but instead empower it.

I'm doubting the use of but + instead. Is either incorrect syntactically? If not, which one reads better? NB: it is for an academic paper.

Irene · Accepted Answer · 2011-12-23 11:43:19Z

3

They are both correct syntactically. In terms of style, the best sentence to use for your purpose is the one with instead in the end.

answered Dec 23, 2011 at 11:43

Irene

12.4k1 gold badge31 silver badges48 bronze badges

+1 because they are both correct syntactically. The comment about style, though, is completely subjective.
– slim
Dec 23, 2011 at 12:36
Note that if there were a long phrase replacing "empower it", you would definitely want to use "but instead ...".
– Peter Shor
Dec 23, 2011 at 14:09
The instead is just an intensifier: "They do not overpower the city, but empower it." would work, as would "They do not overpower, but empower, the city."
– JeffSahol
Dec 23, 2011 at 14:53

Add a comment |

Kris · Accepted Answer · 2011-12-23 11:41:39Z

0

The first expression is correct by itself.
The second one would be correct with a comma:
...city, but instead, empower it.

In the second instance, you may see a slight difference of meaning or shift of emphasis. Syntactically they would be very different I suppose.

answered Dec 23, 2011 at 11:41

Kris

36.6k6 gold badges53 silver badges151 bronze badges

1

The use of commas here would be a matter of style, not of syntax.
– Irene
Dec 23, 2011 at 11:44

Add a comment |

2 Answers 2