0

Why do we treat first person singular and second person with a plural verb?
Is there any reason behind this?
Why is it not like- you was running incredibly fast.
Why is it-you were running incredibly fast.

Could someone tell me the history behind this kind of agreement between sub. and verb. And why in past tense, we treat 'I' with a singular verb?
Whenever I asked about this, I got the answer that it's English...and it's just an exception.

4
  • The answer to this is very well researched (i.e. there definitely is an answer, it's not just "because English"). I thought there would be a question already asked about this on this site but I can't find one right now.
    – CJ Dennis
    Feb 21 '20 at 5:53
  • Could you just explain it to me? I'll be very grateful. I've been wondering this for sooo long!
    – James Ogle
    Feb 21 '20 at 6:04
  • If this question is a duplicate, it should be closed, in which case it will be linked to the other question and you'll have your answer.
    – CJ Dennis
    Feb 21 '20 at 6:10
  • But it hasn't closed till now!!
    – James Ogle
    Feb 21 '20 at 6:25
-1

I'm sure this question is a duplicate, but I can't find it, so I've answered it.

TL;DR: The historic singular "you" was lost and plural "you" took its place.


Early Modern English had singular "thou"/"thee" and plural "ye"/"you". Plural "ye" was also used to show respect to a single person, as "thou" was a term of familiarity.

  • "thou": singular and familiar;
  • "ye": singular formal, or plural.

Singular "thou"/"thee" was replaced by plural formal "ye"/"you" and became obsolete, as did the verb conjugations that went with it. Eventually, "ye" merged with "you" losing "ye" in Standard English giving us the current situation.

Note that the first person pronouns still have four different words for subjective and objective: I, me, we, us, but because of the two historic mergers that only affected "you", the second person pronouns now only have one for all of them: you.


From Wikipedia's article on the word you:

Usage

In standard contemporary Modern English, you is both singular and plural; it always takes a verb form that originally marked the word as plural, (i.e. you are, in common with we are and they are). This was not always so. Early Modern English distinguished between the plural ye and the singular thou. As in many other European languages, English at the time had a T–V distinction, which made the plural forms more respectful and deferential; they were used to address strangers and social superiors. This distinction ultimately led to familiar thou becoming obsolete in modern English, although it persists in some English dialects. Because thou is now seen primarily in literary sources such as the King James Bible (often directed to God, who is traditionally addressed in the familiar) or Shakespeare (often in dramatic dialogues, e.g. "Wherefore art thou Romeo?"), it is now widely perceived as more formal, rather than familiar. Although the other forms for the plural second-person pronoun are now used for the singular second-person pronoun in modern English, the plural reflexive form "yourselves" is not used for the singular; instead "yourself" is used for the singular second-person reflexive pronoun.

Etymology

You is derived from Old English ge or ȝe (both pronounced roughly like Modern English yay), which was the old nominative case form of the pronoun, and eow, which was the old accusative case form of the pronoun. In Middle English the nominative case became ye, and the oblique case (formed by the merger of the accusative case and the former dative case) was you. In early Modern English either the nominative or the accusative form had been generalized in most dialects. Most generalized you; some dialects in the north of England and Scotland generalized ye, or use ye as a clipped or clitic form of the pronoun.

2
  • Ok....so I guess 'I' has got the same evolution (In order to give respect). If it's true, then why didn't we give respect to third person singular?....Thank you with my entire heart
    – James Ogle
    Feb 21 '20 at 7:37
  • I don't believe ye was ever "singular formal"; do you have corroboration for your assertion?
    – Andrew Leach
    Feb 21 '20 at 7:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.