2

Why is it grammatically correct apparently to say, for example "My annoying-ass art teacher"? Or is it? If ass is a noun normally, then what part of speech is it when used to suffix an adjective? Can someone please explain how suffixing adjectives with ass grammatically works out? Is it even technically grammatically correct? If so, what part of speech is it? My question is not a duplicate as it is not related to origins.

  • 1
    Related. (tongue-in-cheek demo of the grammatical phenomenon follows) —> “I don't under-flipping-stand what you think is “techni-fricking-ly flipping ungrammatical" about a postfixed intensi-fricking-fier given the prevalence of bleeding in-fixed ones, or honestly what bloody-official parts of speech have to do with diddly stinking squat here — and I don't mean squat, either. It's fricking-coarse language, even vulgar.” <— It works just like all that.:) – tchrist Jan 28 at 0:41
  • 2
    Get ready for some smart-ass responses. – Walter Mitty Jan 28 at 1:06
  • 2
    No matter what 'ass' was before it was roped in, if the candidate 'boring-ass' say is accepted into the lexicon, it loses its identity in the new compound. A dictionary will pronounce on POS. // Compounds can be formed from words of totally different POS's. // Probably the best judge of wordness for 'X-ass' (or any other candidate) is OED and/or Wiktionary. – Edwin Ashworth Jan 28 at 14:35
  • 1
    I don't know why this question has another round of VTC. It's already has a well received answer, so it doesn't seem to need any further clarity. – CJ Dennis Jan 30 at 22:50
  • 1
    Why would it make any more sense to ask what part of speech that ‑ass “is” than it does to ask what part of speech ‑ess or ‑er “is”, let alone ‑ly or ‑ed or un‑ or ‑ize, or super- or ovo‑ or lacto‑ or homo‑, or ‑wise or ‑kin? Combining forms have no part of speech in their own right. That's because they are not, for want of a better term, “words”. Read the comment by @EdwinAshworth or even better the posted answer from Tinfoil Hat: quaerendo invenietis. – tchrist Feb 2 at 2:52
4

Yes, it's fine to say annoying-ass art teacher (though I don't advise doing that while she's within earshot). When ass is applied as an intensifier, it combines with its host to form an "amplified" adjective. The OED has your back (so to speak):

ass, n.2
4. As the second element in compounds, forming adjectives with the sense ‘having or displaying the quality designated by the first element to an extreme or undesirable degree’, as broad-ass, snobby-ass, cheap-ass, sorry-ass, stupid-ass, long-ass, etc. Cf. ASSED adj.
1. See also BIG-ASS adj., PANSY-ASS adj., poor-ass adj. at POOR adj. and n.1 Compounds 1c, punk-ass adj. at PUNK n.1 and adj.2 Compounds 2, raggedy-ass adj. at RAGGEDY adj. Compounds.

Diana Elgersma's fine abstract Serious-ass morphology: The anal emphatic in English notes that:

Mono- and bi-syllabic adjectives are the most frequent bases for the ‘-ass’ affix; however, though marked, tri+-syllabic adjectives are not ungrammatical . . .

So, while an·noy·ing-ass doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, you're good to go.


Further reading:

Ass/F***ing Intensification

Asses and big asses

  • 2
    Ironic how often anal emphatics are written with silly-a** analphabetics. – tchrist Feb 2 at 2:54
  • 1
    @tchrist: anal-phabetic . . . nice one! Sure as sh*t a dictionary candidate . . . – Tinfoil Hat Feb 2 at 4:22
0

It depends on the context of your situation. If you are talking casually, of course it's okay! It mostly depends on who you are talking to. You would not call your college professor a "dude," and you wouldn't talk extremely formally in front of your friends either. Furthermore, "ass," like some other words, can be multiple parts of speech. It can be used as a noun, or an adjective,

0

In an early comment on the post, @tchrist gives the example “I don't under-flipping-stand what you think is “techni-fricking-ly flipping ungrammatical" This is known as "Expletive infixation" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expletive_infixation - the oath remains an interjection.

Infixes (placed inside the word), prefixes (placed in front of the word) and suffixes (placed after the word) are affixes - your examples is a suffix. Thus it appears to be an expletive suffix.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.