In a quality control form I'm working on, there are 4 types of results for a product test:

  • All quality requirements are attended (Approved);
  • There is a minor defect in the product (Approved with remarks);
  • There is a major defect in the product (Reproved);
  • There is a major defect in the product, it would be considered as reproved, but a manager/coordinator can release it to market as is. This situation happens when a product has a defect but it will be sold with some discount or something like that.

The form is like this:

Test result:
( ) Approved
( ) Approved with remarks
( ) Reproved
( ) "word"

All translations point to "released", but this word sounds like a product that has no defects.

Considering that a person needs to "check" one of these 4 options in a form, what would be the correct word to use on the 4th result option?

  • I would call it "Max".
    – Hot Licks
    Oct 30, 2019 at 20:44

3 Answers 3


Such goods are sometimes labelled as second quality or seconds which Lexico gives as

2.5 (seconds) Goods of an inferior quality.

Synonyms: imperfect goods, faulty goods, defective goods, flawed goods, inferior goods, rejects, export rejects, discards.

The question does not ask about the other three terms, but I would reverse the sequence of the last two so they are in order of acceptability, and describe them thus

Test result:
( ) Approved
( ) Imperfect (state reason)
( ) Seconds (state reason)
( ) Reject
  • All these are good. You sometimes see other variations such as "second class", "B class", etc, on goods as well.
    – Stuart F
    Oct 31, 2019 at 10:38

A word that would probably distinguish that 4th option could be

Admitted [to market with bugs]


All quality requirements are attended (Approved);

I do not think 'attended' is the correct word here. I think you are trying to use it in the context of: "All quality requirements [have been] attended [to]." That is, all requirements are met or have been sorted out - the product is "First class" or top quality. I think it would be better to phrase this as: "All quality requirements have been met."

There is a minor defect in the product (Approved with remarks); There is a major defect in the product (Reproved);

Again, 'reproved' is not correct here. Reproved means to reprimand (someone), or tell someone off for doing something wrong, for example: "He was reproved for shouting in the library."

I would suggest: "Not fit for purpose" or simply "Defective" is more appropriate.

As far a a product 'Released to Service' with a known defect is concerned, the software industry tend to use 'Beta' to indicate an early release [probably] containing some defects, which may, or may not be known.

However, if a product, like a coat or a sofa is sold with known defects, this is usually either: "Sold as seen" - so that the purchaser is made aware that its not perfect - and cannot then sue for damages if it does not work properly, or the item is described as a "Second", that is, of a lesser quality (Second Class - as in a railway ticket) than the "First Quality" or "Premium" quality item.

  • Very good to know that the other words were wrong before I finish the form. I'm gonna accept Weather Vane answer because it was posted first with "second" as the correct word, but your answer helped me a lot too! Thank you very much! +1
    – Laerte
    Oct 31, 2019 at 11:50
  • No problem... Glad we were able to help.
    – NeilB
    Oct 31, 2019 at 20:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.