5

Which word goes in the blank (their or its)?

The stones are small, but ___ value is great.

I think it is their but my child's paper says it is its. Which is correct and why?

Improve this question

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
14

In the sentence you gave, their is correct. The antecedent of the underlined pronoun is the stones, which is a plural noun phrase. Therefore the correct statement is:

The stones are small, but their value is great.

Improve this answer
14

I think JSBangs's answer is probably correct, but I wanted to clarify that in some cases it may be incorrect, depending on the context. It depends what the pronoun "it" is meant to refer to. If "it" refers to the stones, then it should be "they" since there are multiple stones. However, consider the following:

The ring was quite impressive, solid gold with many fine rubies. The stones were small, but its value was great because of its age.

In this example "the stones" refers to the rubies, which are small, but the ring is nevertheless still valuable. In this example "it" refers to the ring and it using "their" instead would change the meaning of the sentence. So depending on the context, either word might be correct.

Improve this answer
2
  • 8
    As a style choice, I think I would use "the ring's" instead of "its" in your sentence. Otherwise, it's just a little bit unclear.
    – Marthaª
    Commented Nov 17, 2010 at 15:14
  • 1
    @Martha: I don't disagree. I just wanted to provide a counter-example. I think the sentence is understandable if not ideal.
    – Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
    Commented Nov 17, 2010 at 20:09
1

My 3rd grader has the same question in her grammar book and the answer key says the correct answer is their. Like others have stated it would be their because the pronoun is referring to the stones (plural).

Improve this answer
-5

I may be wrong here, but I think 'its' and 'their' both are incorrect. As per my knowledge, non living things cannot take possessive pronouns unless its a case of 'Personification'.

Improve this answer
6
  • Non-living things are used as possessives all the time.
    – JSBձոգչ
    Commented Nov 17, 2010 at 6:06
  • I think you got me wrong. I said that non-living things cannot be used as living things. e.g. - 'The table's legs are broken' is incorrect because table is non-living.
    – Sid
    Commented Nov 17, 2010 at 7:43
  • 10
    I don't know where you got the idea that non-living nouns cannot take possessives, but that is totally wrong. I cannot imagine any dialect of English in which "the table's legs are broken" is not perfectly valid. Whether a noun is living or not has little to no effect on its use with possessives or pronouns.
    – Jon Purdy
    Commented Nov 17, 2010 at 10:44
  • @Jon, I think you are overstating the case. I think there is a tendency to restrict 's to animate possessors, though it is not the definite rule that SidCool states. But this certainly does not apply to 'its' or 'theirs'.
    – Colin Fine
    Commented Nov 17, 2010 at 17:14
  • @ColinFine The dog ate the cat's food again, so in retaliation, the cat pooped in the dog's bed.
    – Spencer
    Commented Nov 19, 2019 at 11:35