0

The rule I once wrote in my documents from the internet:

The article is omitted when comparison is between different levels of performance/execution by the same person or thing:

He runs fastest when he has had a good breakfast.

She works best in the mornings.

In other cases we use "the":

Of all the boys, Jim runs the fastest.

She works the best in our team.

Now I have two sentences:

ldoceonline.com:

1. The south of the country is the worst hit by the recession.

oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com:

2. Rural areas have been worst hit by the strike.

In accordance with my rule, both 1. and 2. must be written with "the".

So:

What is the difference between 1. and 2.?

Why is there not "the" in 2.?

Is my rule not correct?

Thanks!

  • Your rule is wrong. The article can be used in both of your original sentences: (1) He runs the fastest when he has had a good breakfast. (2) She works the best in the mornings. It can also be omitted in your next two sentences: (3) Of all the boys, Jim runs fastest. (4) She works best in our team. All four sentences are grammatical both with and without the article. Whether or not you use an article is a matter of style and personal choice. – Jason Bassford Supports Monica Sep 29 '19 at 22:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.