2

[A] Haven’t they sold many tickets?

[B] Haven’t they sold a lot of tickets?

According to the Cambridge dictionary, there's a difference in meaning here.

When we use much and many in negative questions, we are usually expecting that a large quantity of something isn’t there. When we use a lot of and lots of in negative questions, we are usually expecting a large quantity of something.

Is this distinction clear to native speakers? Do they actually use it and understand it the way it's described?

I'm having a bit of a hard time trying to understand it myself.

Why does using many/much show that we expect there's a small quantity of something?

Why does using a lot of show that we expect a large quantity of something?

  • 1
    Hello, Katherine. First of all one has to look at the exclamatory sentence "Haven’t they sold a lot of tickets!" This informs (when being read) one's take of the second sentence above. The first sentence can't be visualised this way. // However, immediate context will inform the reading to a greater degree. – Edwin Ashworth Sep 12 at 18:14
  • 1
    Welcome to SE ELU. This site is for objective questions not those which are a matter of opinion. It is also primarily for native speakers. Therefore don’t ask whether people feel a difference, ask what the difference is. And in general ask on English Language Learners rather than here. See the Tour, which you never completed. – David Sep 12 at 18:20
  • 1
    After reading the CED examples in situ, I think that they are confusing the exclamatory observation "Haven't they sold a lot of tickets. [I thought they'd sell quite a few, but not this many!]" with a true question. I'd say "Isn’t there much food left?" and "Isn’t there a lot of food left?" are paraphrases, while "Isn’t there a lot of food left!/." is the exclamatory observation. – Edwin Ashworth Sep 12 at 18:28
  • 3
    Yes. There is a difference. The dictionary is more or less correct here. However, it depends on the state of the conversation prior to the question, which is somewhat rhetorical in nature. – Global Charm Sep 13 at 0:57
  • 1
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about the feelings of native speakers are only likely to give individual subjective answers. – David Oct 13 at 19:09
3

The examples given in CED need more context to clarify the claims made in the dictionary.

There's a reading of [B], as I think Global implies, in the context:

["But I was hearing that the 'Purple Floyd' concert was looking like being a great success.] Haven’t they [already] sold a lot of tickets?" (ie I'm looking for confirmation that a lot have been sold)

that corresponds to 'When we use a lot of / lots of in negative questions, we are usually expecting there to be a large quantity of something, and soliciting confirmation' (From CED, amended).

Conversely, someone using [A] is certainly expecting, or being quite prepared to be given, confirmation that not many tickets have been sold:

["Why is the concert likely to be cancelled?] Haven’t they sold many tickets?" (I'm expecting the answer "No").

.............................

Of course, the exclamatory sentence

[C] "[Wow,] haven’t they sold a lot of tickets./!"

(there isn't one corresponding in form to [A]) must be distinguished, though it almost certainly influences some people's reading of [B]. But in speech, the intonation patterns used in [B] and [C] are quite different.

0

"Haven’t they sold many tickets?" implies that ticket sales appear to be weak.

"Haven’t they sold a lot of tickets?" implies that ticket sales appear to be strong.

But a lot depends on the greater context.

  • I think your assessment of the "a lot" version is not well-founded. As a mere interrogative it could go either way. – Robusto Oct 14 at 0:56
  • @Robusto - As I said, a lot depends on the context. – Hot Licks Oct 14 at 1:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.