2

I feel certain that there is a common phrase for this, but for the life of me, I cannot remember it:

What idiom is there for the concept of promoting someone as a way of keeping them out of the way? Someone you don’t want to fire or lay off, possibly because of their long service and wanting to reward them, possibly because of concerns about the PR or morale effect of such a lay-off, whatever, but someone you don’t want to have to deal with. So you promote them into a position where they cannot advance and cannot influence matters important to you, and they’re just stuck there.

The position they end up in is a “dead-end job” but it’s far from the only, or most common, form of dead-end job, so that phrase doesn’t help me. I am looking either for a phrase describing the act of promoting someone in this fashion, or a phrase describing this position very specifically, so either

He was [promoted] to chief pencil-pusher.

or

His was promoted, to chief pencil-pusher, a [dead-end job].

With “[promoted]” or “[dead-end job]” replaced with a more specific idiom that refers to this particular situation.

  • There's a German phrase "jemanden wegloben" which means literally to praise someone away, but I can't think of a good English equivalent. The answer below (Dilbert principle) works though. – S Conroy Jul 3 at 16:25
4

"Kick Upstairs"

to promote to a nominally higher level so as to be rid of on a lower, but more effective, level, as in a corporation

2

Perhaps the Dilbert principle (from Wikipedia):

The Dilbert principle is a concept in management developed by Scott Adams, creator of the comic strip Dilbert, which states that companies tend to systematically promote incompetent employees to management to get them out of the workflow.

  • Yes, definitely the right idea. I don’t quite think it was the phrase I had in mind, but it could be I was just misremembering. – KRyan Jul 3 at 16:05
  • A variant of the Peter’s Principle: employees are promoted until they reach their level of incompetence. – Stefan Jul 3 at 16:23
  • @Stefan, I'd say the Dilbert principle and the Peter principle are complementary: the former is a possible remedy for the latter. – Anton Sherwood Jul 4 at 15:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.