0

Nimzowitsch did not write a simple handbook of opening lines, but a manual of chess. The opinions, ideas, and generalisations that he describes gave rise to a true revolution, whose consequences we can correctly evaluate today.

I can't understand what 'whose' mean in this sentence. Is it Nimzowitsch's consequences? or the consequences of the opinions, ideas, and generalisations?

  • I agree that the sentence was somewhat ambiguous about which consequences were meant. It didn't help that the previous sentence included a "who": Nimzowitsch. I would have preferred "the consequences of which" rather than "whose consequences," but as SP999 implies, restating the word "revolution" would be better than using a pronoun with too many possible antecedents. – Literalman Jun 27 at 14:57
0

It means "We can correctly evaluate the consequences of the revolution."

Some examples from WHOSE | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary

used for adding information about a person or thing just mentioned:

Cohen, whose short film won awards, was chosen to direct the movie.

There was a picture in the paper of a man whose leg had been blown off.

They meet in an old house, whose basement has been converted into a chapel.

Fraud detectives are investigating the company, three of whose senior executives have already been arrested.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.