I recently read a long list of English proverbs and strongly felt that a considerable number of them have a double meaning, despite that the explanations of the proverbs provide only one meaning for each proverb.
I am curious as to whether native English speakers see double meanings of English proverbs as I do and, if not, whether my perception is due to insufficient understanding of usage and flavors of English words or due to my ways of thinking shaped by the culture of my country.
Let me show you a few specific examples of how I see double meanings in English proverbs.
Proverb 1: The labourer is worthy of his wages.
Standard interpretation: Workers should or deserve to be paid for their time and effort.
Alternative interpretation: The worthiness of a labourer can be judged by how much he is paid. If he were more valuable than that, he would be able to better sell his time and effort on the job market.
Proverb 2: The Devil take the hindmost.
Standard interpretation: Each person must work independently toward their own success, as in competitive situations.
Alternative interpretation: It is not good for the society to help those who lag behind, for they are unworthy. So may the Devil take them.
Proverb 3: Only fools and horses work.
Standard interpretation: One should find an easy way to make money, like an invention or a creative business idea, instead of resorting to hard graft.
Alternative interpretation: Smart people are able to exploit others.
Proverb 4: Cheaters never win and winners never cheat.
Standard interpretation: Cheaters will ultimately pay a price for their deception and will not prosper in the long run.
Alternative interpretation: If someone was caught cheating, he did not win, and if someone won, he was not caught cheating.
My question is this: Are my alternative interpretations permitted by the English language? In other words, is it possible for native speakers to interpret these proverbs as I did, or are there some factors that exclude my alternative interpretations?