0

I think I read from somewhere(I think it was 'element of style') that below one is more appropriate. but I'm not sure that I remember correctly.

  1. all the guitarists, that I admire, are bald. I'm pretty sure that I'll become a good guitarist sooner or later.
  2. all the guitarists, who I admire, are bald. I'm pretty sure that I'll become a good guitarist sooner or later.

am I right? is there a more natural way to put in? can this be considered a noun phrase? Thanks in advance!

  • 1
    I wonder why your sentences so seldom begin with capital letters. And why you include the second sentence in each example? Is it relevant? "All the guitarists I admire are bald" is more natural. – Old Brixtonian Jun 13 at 19:46
0

In both sentences there should be no comma after guitarists unless you mean to say that you admire all guitarists. I think you mean to point out the coincidence that of all the guitarists in the world those whom you admire (that is, not all of them) are bald, so the comma is omitted to show that you are talking about 'the guitarists I admire'.

In the second sentence some would prefer 'whom' to 'who'. Some would prefer 'whom' to 'that' because the former clearly refers to people and 'that' does not. You will nevertheless find 'that' used in such contexts. You can avoid relative pronouns altogether as @OldBrixtonian's comment does.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.