This is something very odd I have noticed in some older books, most recently in "Crime and Punishment" by Dostoyevsky. Place names, when not specifically essential or well-known, are made up of one letter followed by a line of underscores (i.e. "X_____"). I think I recall reading something similar in another older work, possibly by Jane Austin?

Apologies if this is a duplicate; I've searched quite extensively and can't seem to figure it out. I don't know a name for this, so can't search easily for it.


1 Answer 1


It's censorship. The notes in one edition say:

The omission of part of the names here, as elsewhere in the text, was done by Dostoyevsky in order to placate the censor

(See also Why are place names obscured in Charlotte Brontë's The Professor? for a fuller explanation about the use in literature.)

Much like how we now usually use asterisks, older works typically used em dashes (not underscores, which are lower on the line).

The New English Dictionary (1887), predecessor of the Oxford English Dictionary, says this of "bloody":

[...]now constantly in the mouths of the lowest classes, but by respectable people considered ‘a horrid word’, on a par with obscene or profane language, and usually printed in the newspapers (in police reports, etc.) ‘b——y’.

Because (or in spite of?) the subject, Grose's Classical Dictionary of The Vulgar Tongue also has plenty of examples. Here's one where "turd" is censored:

Honey Moon. The first month after marriage. A poor honey; a harmless, foolish, good-natured fellow. It is all honey, or all t—d, with them; said of persons who are either in the extremity of friendship or enmity, either kissing or fighting.

Further down on the page, "**** hooks" is defined as "fingers", so asterisks were also sometimes used, particularly when all the letters were censored as to prevent it from looking like a regular em dash. (The omitted word here is "cunt".)

  • 2
    You'd really think that a Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue might actually use the vulgar tongue!
    – Andrew Leach
    Jun 8, 2019 at 20:36
  • 2
    Most of this answer is about omitting letters in the words that are regarded as vulgar; the question is about omitting letters in place names. While it is easy to see why the censors might be concerned about the former, some explanation is needed of why they would be concerned about the latter.
    – jsw29
    Mar 20, 2021 at 21:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.