3

These words appear to be synonymous, so I checked to see the difference on Wikidiff which gives the following definitions:

One who governs a country, province, or colony as the representative of a monarch.
One who rules in place of the monarch, especially because the monarch is too young, absent, or disabled.


I also checked thesaurus.plus which uses the same definition for each and also notes the following:

Viceroy and regent are semantically related. in director topic. In some cases you can use "Viceroy" instead a noun "Regent"

Despite that, I did not see a clear difference. What exactly is the overlap? Where is the difference? When would you use one over the other?

  • “as a representative of” vs “in place of”... – Jim May 19 at 19:50
  • Can you elaborate? – Donald Trump May 20 at 4:29
  • 4
    A regent governs the monarch's own country if the monarch is unable to. A viceroy governs a colony on behalf of a reigning monarch. – Kate Bunting May 20 at 7:30
  • The definition above says "country, province, or colony", doesn't that mean both can rule a country? – Donald Trump May 20 at 11:50
3

The difference, using the words from your research, is between ruling in place of (i.e. instead of) the monarch (regent) and ruling as a representative of the monarch for part of their land (viceroy).

Let's take the UK and India as an example. They're both countries, they have the same monarch, who resides in the UK. If the monarch rules in the UK, and assigns someone to rule India, then the ruler of India is a viceroy. For example, Louis Mountbatten was Viceroy of India while George Vi was King of the UK and Commonwealth (though the Prime Minister Clement Attlee held the true power in the UK).

If, however, someone was ruling the UK for the monarch, and the monarch wasn't ruling anything at all, then they'd be a regent. For example, in the later years of King George III's rule his insanity meant that no-one wanted him to rule, so his son became Prince Regent, with all the power of the king. (Later when George III died his son ceased to be regent and became king in his own right, George IV).

  • @ab2 - thank you, edited in. – AndyT May 24 at 8:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.