0

Is this sentence, "These restaurants are for people who are always in haste." grammatically correct? Can I use verb-to-be before "in haste"? Thank you so much!

  • 2
    The grammar is a hair "starchy", but there's nothing wrong with it. – Hot Licks Apr 27 '19 at 12:58
  • how about "on the go"? – Cascabel Apr 27 '19 at 16:00
  • These restaurants are for busy people. – Nigel J Apr 27 '19 at 18:19
  • In haste tends to occur as a comment on the pragmatics of the utterance, as when someone uses it as a close in a note: In haste, Letitia. – John Lawler Apr 27 '19 at 22:00
  • I would phrase it as "... always in a hurry." – TrevorD Apr 28 '19 at 0:01
1

From the corpus COCA https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/, I get only 5 occurrences containing "be(am,is,are,were,was) in haste", but get 742 instances with "be in a hurry". So "be in haste" is rarely used if not mistaken and it is safe to use "be in a hurry".

| improve this answer | |

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.