5

I happen to find superlatives with the structure below:

Adjective + most,

which are: the rearmost, the frontmost, the uppermost, the headmost, the outermost, the topmost, etc.

What are the general rules to form this type of superlative? Is it related to direction?

  • Matt, I actually find "outmost" in Oxford dictionary. Do we normally use "outermost" because "outmost" is considered archaic? – AndonDraif Nov 23 '11 at 14:09
4

They mean the latest point reachable when you move in a certain direction:

  • rightmost -> move right until you can't move anymore
  • headmost -> move ahead until you can't move anymore

and so on.

The point you've reached when you can't move anymore is the point the speaker is talking about.

So in general:

  • "direction"most -> move in "direction" until you can't move anymore. You will see what I mean there
  • 1
    Utmost? Uttermost? – FumbleFingers Nov 23 '11 at 16:19
  • 1
    Good idea :-). The "ut" in "utmost" is an old form of "out", so it's a direction in that sense too. It's going to the point the furthest out. – Raku Nov 23 '11 at 17:13
0

The "general rule" to form an "Adjective + most" superlative is, tack on most after an adjective, and see if it's meaningful and sounds right; which is how most such words were formed. There are some interesting "misformed" exceptions, for example foremost which derives as a corruption or variant of formest or fyrmest, "altered on the assumption that it is a compound of fore and most."

Most itself is a superlative of much, many, or more (but is sometimes used colloquially in place of almost). As a suffix, it lends a "most extreme" meaning, in the same sense or "direction" suggested by the word it suffixes.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.