1

I find that often, in technical writing, I want to specify that or is non-exclusive: or ≠ xor; or = and/or.

(Stylistically, "and or" is terrible and gets tiresome quickly;)

As an example of the type of ambiguity that can arise, see I need clarification on the use of the word “either”.

If one has established an "xor" in natural language, "or" can be assumed to be non-exclusive can be assumed, but that may not be explicit enough.

  • Has attempted to introduce, even unsuccessfully, a contraction for "non-exclusive or" that relates symbolically to xor?

--------------------------------------------

Russel & Whitehead used "v" as a symbol. [See: Symbol for 'Or']

See also: Does “or” mean both conditions?

  • I hope this question will be found tolerable, as it is a serious one. I linked three related, useful (but under-voted) previous stack questions. – DukeZhou Mar 24 '19 at 1:25
  • 1
    There's only and/or really. It does get tiresome, but the workarounds are not much less tiresome, and in any long-ish piece of writing (in a field where this comes up a lot), you will eventually come across a situation where even the best workaround is so clumsy it's better to use and/or - and then you'll wish you'd bitten the bullet the first time and used it throughout. – user339660 Mar 24 '19 at 17:17
0

As far as I know, there is no natural language contraction for the inclusive or.

In fact, in order to make it explicit, you have to write something even longer:

You can choose A, B, or A and B.

But even that may not be explicit enough—because it doesn't absolutely rule out the possibility of not making a choice—or making a choice that isn't any of those things.

If an inclusive choice has be made, then you have to say something like this:

You must choose A, B, or A and B.


Note that this also applies to the natural language equivalent of the exclusive or:

You can choose either A or B, but not both.

Generally, adding just either is enough; however, many people add the extra three words if they want to make sure there is no room for any confusion at all.

And also, in the more explicit version:

You must choose either A or B, but not both.

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.