The expression "lends credence to the conjecture" is standard. I was wondering if it sounds hyperformal or affected and can be replaced by "provides evidence as to the validity of the conjecture", "provides evidence for the validity of the conjecture", or "improves the confidence in the conjecture".

closed as primarily opinion-based by FumbleFingers, tchrist Mar 24 at 16:17

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • X lends credence to the conjecture = X supports the conjecture. A weaker assertion than validates, proves. – FumbleFingers Mar 20 at 13:55
  • Yes, but "provides evidence as to the validity" is definitely weaker than "validate" or "prove", as "evidence" implies some degree of uncertainty. – Themis Mitsis Mar 20 at 18:09
  • You keep mentioning evidence (in principle, definitive confirmation of a hypothesis), but a relatively weak assertion about lending credence wouldn't usually be used in contexts where there's actual "evidence" involved. Even credence itself (weakly lent, more forcefully, conferred) is just about being "credible" (can't rule it out, not must believe it). – FumbleFingers Mar 20 at 18:29

Hyper formal or affected language is determined by your audience. Some groups won't mind "lends credence to the conjecture" others will be repelled by it.

Here's one persons thoughts on how to Tailor Your Writing to Your Audience https://www.writeraccess.com/blog/tailoring-your-writing-to-your-audience/

FumbleFingers has suggested some alternatives - supports, validates, proves

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.