0

If you are abbreviating a word in a document, and that same word shows up in a citation that is NOT a quote, should/can you abbreviate it? My thought is yes. Does it matter if it is a quote?

  • Welcome to ELU. I think this might come down to individual style, and therefore be opinion-based and off topic. I hope I’m wrong because it is an interesting question. Personally, I would opt for accuracy over brevity. So, if the quote used the full term, I would use the full term in the quote, but abbreviate in my own words. Is there a reason (word limit?) why you would opt for brevity over word for word accuracy? – Pam Mar 15 at 20:41
  • 1
    I think examples of the sort of thing you're asking about would help here. – Andrew Leach Mar 15 at 21:38
0

If the citation is not a quote, then it's your own words (you're paraphrasing), so you can do whatever you like. Making it consistent with the rest of your writing seems appropriate.

If the citation is a quote, you normally report it verbatim. However, minor elisions and edits can be made, so long as you put them in [...]. So if the quote used a verbose phrase, which you've been abbreviating, I think it would be acceptable to replace it with [abbreviation].

If this is a scholarly article being submitted to a journal, you would do best to ask the journal editors what their preferred style is.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.