There's a use of the word "ought" from the Bible I don't understand.

I've highlighted the relevant word:

Acts 4:32
And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
King James Version

I've checked dictionaries and I can't find a meaning of "ought" that makes sense to me within this passage.


'Ought' is an archaic spelling of 'aught', which is another old word meaning 'anything' or 'any'.

So the meaning is:

None of the believers considered that any of the things they owned were theirs.

This is born out by more modern translations of the passage. E.g.

All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had. (New International Version).

  • Ah, thank you, that makes more sense than the meaning of "aught" I found, to own or possess. – Zebrafish Mar 9 '19 at 4:35
  • Yes, the word survives in Northern English dialects as "owt" as in "'Ast tha got owt t'eat, son?" (in Standard English "Do you have any food my boy?"). – BoldBen Mar 9 '19 at 9:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.