This word has been in occasional use since at least the early 17th century, when Shakespeare used it in The Tempest: “To make cold nymphs chaste crowns; and thy broom-groves, Whose shadow the dismissed bachelor loves, being lass-lorn.”

closed as off-topic by lbf, Cascabel, Hugo, jimm101, choster Feb 12 at 15:29

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    Have you looked up the word in a dictionary? What did that leave you unclear about? – Janus Bahs Jacquet Feb 10 at 10:02
  • Shakespeare is overrated. If he had had a better vocabulary he wouldn't have had to make so much up. – Mitch Feb 10 at 15:46
  • 1
    @Mitch I suspect that he didn't make up most of these words. He was what we would now call a lower-midde-class (if not working class) lad from a small town in the sticks who was one of the earliest men to write and publish in ordinary colloquial English. I believe that he was just the first person to publish these words, not the first to use them. – BoldBen Feb 10 at 23:13

It is a coinage by analogy with forlorn. lorn means "lacking" or "deprived of" or "having lost".

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.