-1

I am pondering over the meaning of the riddle:

Would you rather be nearly drowned or nearly rescued?

Could some one explain the meaning of the two phrases "nearly drowned" & "nearly rescued" ?

Also what does the riddle actually mean ?

  • Where did you hear this? – Zebrafish Feb 7 at 23:37
  • I was reading about something on quora when I stumbled upon this. Seems its from a book. – stormfield Feb 7 at 23:37
  • 5
    A nearly drowned person is alive. A nearly rescued person is not. So yes I would rather be nearly drowned, despite however much I might complain. – mckenzm Feb 8 at 5:17
15

Nearly drowned means you almost died by means of drowning, but did not drown. This means you survived.
Nearly rescued means you almost were saved by a third-party, but were not saved. This means you are still being affected by the situation (in this case, drowning to death).

The riddle hinges on this distinction. It's better to almost die but not die, than to be almost saved from dying but still die.

  • 2
    Note that people sometimes confuse "near(ly)" with "narrow(ly)". If you narrowly drowned, you were nearly rescued (= you drowned). If you were narrowly rescued, you nearly drowned (= you were rescued). – Flater Feb 8 at 8:27
5

You almost drowned.

vs.

You were almost rescued.

In the former, you're alive.

In the latter, you're dead.

4

If you were "nearly drowned" you just avoided drowning, by implication you were probably rescued. If you were "nearly rescued" then someone tried to rescue you but just failed. By implication you drowned!

There is another, rather dated and much less frequently used meaning of "nearly" which is "only just". The joke in the riddle is, presumably, based on this double meaning. The question could then be taken to mean "Would you rather be almost drowned or almost rescued" or "Would you rather be only just drowned or only just rescued".

Presumably the person who asked the riddle would, whatever answer was given, then say, something like "Oh, you'd rather be dead then". It's not a very funny joke but it could be from an old book, most Victorian humour seems pretty strange to 21st century people.

  • "most Victorian humour seems pretty strange to 21st century people" I wonder what people few centuries after us would be talking about. "Yes, 21st century people had this strange humour based on images with text overlaid on them." – VLAZ Feb 8 at 12:52
  • @vlaz Of course, most humour generally dates very quickly. Even the most accessible stuff like Three Men in a Boat, The Diary of a Nobody and The Importance of Being Earnest isn't as funny now as it used to be. I think it's a combination of the change of language and, probably more importantly, the changes in the social background that mean that a lot of the references don't have the immediate resonance. – BoldBen Feb 9 at 12:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.