3

An example of this would be the word "Film". Film is no longer the medium that we use to record movies but we still refer to movies as films. What is it called when an older term is used to refer to something but it no longer applies in the literal sense?

marked as duplicate by michael.hor257k, FumbleFingers, lbf, tchrist single-word-requests Jan 7 at 17:37

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • like xerox a copy – lbf Jan 7 at 16:10
  • It's called "meaning change" and it's a normal part of language. Think of the fact that we "dial" numbers though the dial is no longer part of the phone. – John Lawler Jan 7 at 16:10
  • @michael.hor257k: I can't find it right now, but I'm pretty sure there's another ELU question about this where one of the answers includes some technical term (perhaps derived from ancient Greek) for such usages. Feasibly it was specifically in respect of images - such as a "cartoon" image of an old-style box camera with a red line drawn through it, to mean No filming (at a paid performance venue, for example). – FumbleFingers Jan 7 at 16:28
  • 1
    @FumbleFingers I don't really think this is at all what the OP is looking for. Look at the article: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeuomorph – Lordology Jan 7 at 16:33
  • 1
    Oh - I see - It's just when people burst out with found it! it usually seems like they have an answer. I wasn't sure whether you were relating to your last comment or not. Simple case of misunderstanding ;) – Lordology Jan 7 at 16:40
-1

I like anachronism here, from Dictionary.com

anachronism [uh-nak-ruh-niz-uh m]

noun something or someone that is not in its correct historical or chronological time, especially a thing or person that belongs to an earlier time: The sword is an anachronism in modern warfare.

-3

This is called 'ETYMOLOGICAL MEANING'. The etymological meaning is the first meaning which is the base of further semantic development of the word.

According to Etymology Online:

film (n.)

Old English filmen "membrane, thin skin, foreskin," from West Germanic  *filminjan (source also of Old Frisian filmene "skin," Old English fell  "hide"), extended from Proto-Germanic  *fello(m)"animal hide," from PIE root *pel- (3) "skin, hide."

Sense of "a thin coat of something" is 1570s, extended by 1845 to the coating of chemical gel on photographic plates.

By 1895 this also meant the coating plus the paper or celluloid.

Hence "a motion picture" (1905); sense of "film-making as a craft or art" is from 1920.

  • -1 no sources cited – Lordology Jan 7 at 16:16
  • 2
    The OP is not asking about the shift in meaning from membrane to motion picture, but from chemically recorded motion picture to electronically recorded motion picture. – jsw29 Jan 7 at 16:49
  • @Lordology actually, user3072... specifically mentions "Etymology Online" but the answer, unfortunately, is wrong in any case. – Mari-Lou A Jan 7 at 18:37
  • There is no exact answer for the previous questions. – user307254 Jan 7 at 18:42
  • @Mari-LouA No, I mean no sources to prove that 'etymological meaning' is a thing, and when I Google it apparently it isn't. – Lordology Jan 7 at 20:31

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.