0

I was taught in my first year geology class that fluvial meant meant "relating to water", but OED defines it as such:

Geology:

Of or found in a river.

Could I use "fluvial" to describe water originating from a man-made source, e.g.:

"There was a significant fluvial deposit left on the road from the flooding caused by the burst pipe."

If it is not valid, what would be?

4
  • 1
    Use "diluvial". ....
    – SAH
    Commented Dec 24, 2018 at 2:03
  • 1
    ...or "diluvian."
    – SAH
    Commented Dec 24, 2018 at 2:04
  • 1
    Sorry, but why are you wanting to use such a high register word to describe a puddle?
    – KarlG
    Commented Dec 24, 2018 at 6:13
  • @KarlG, So I know which word to use when it causes a really big puddle. ;)
    – Morgoth
    Commented Dec 25, 2018 at 17:23

1 Answer 1

3

While the dictionary at geology.com does not appear to carry fluvial, the dictionary of geography at itseducation.asia gives the following definition:

lit. of a river. Used to distinguish processes and landforms from similar ones that may be produced by a different agent, e.g. fluvial deposition rather than glacial deposition.

Merriam-Webster defines fluvial as follows:

1 of, relating to, or living in a stream or river

2 produced by the action of a stream

a fluvial plain

Oxford Living Dictionaries gives the following definition:

adjective, geology

Of or found in a river.

‘fluvial processes’

‘fluvial deposits’

Origin Middle English: from Latin fluvialis, from fluvius ‘river’, from fluere ‘to flow’.

In particular, note the etymology given.

The Online Dictionary of Etymology agrees:

"pertaining to a river,"

late 14c., from Latin fluvialis "of a river," from fluvius "a river, stream, running water," related to fluere "to flow" (see fluent).

As far as I can see, you can look through all the definitions Onelook finds for fluvial and none of them give any suggestion that fluvial can be used in any context other than in reference to rivers. Ponds and streams is as far a stretch from a river as any goes, in the 1913 Webster. (A rather pedantic argument could be made that as fluvial derives from a word referring to flowing water it is applicable even to a broken drain, but I can't find any evidence for current usage to lend credence to this kind of speculation.)

Moreover, the sense the geographical dictionary entry above gives would suggest that flooding from a pipe would be specifically excluded from the meaning of fluvial, and that it would be misleading to use the word in such a context.


Based on all this, I would say that the answer to your question

Could I use "fluvial" to describe water originating from a man-made source[?]

is no, not in the case at hand, despite what you were taught.

(However, I would see no problem using it in relation to deposits from, say, a diverted river, which is arguably a man-made source, albeit one that is still a river.)

To go on, your example sentence works perfectly well without fluvial and is completely clear without anything taking its place:

There was a significant deposit left on the road from the flooding caused by the burst pipe.

1
  • @KJO I tend towards removing words rather than adding them, though I don't presume to be definitive in my suggestion. In your example, if it's a piped-up river (or a part thereof) I think you could use fluvial without any trouble, particularly when referring to the particles carried and their origin. I'd think a fully enclosed river like the Fleet in London could still be said to leave fluvial deposits. ($0.02, FWIW.)
    – tmgr
    Commented Dec 24, 2018 at 11:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.