1

This question already has an answer here:

I was having a walk when the dog suddenly bit me.

My colleague felt 'having a walk' is not appropriate, and that the correct expression is 'going for a walk' or 'taking a walk'.

Why is "having a walk" incorrect?

marked as duplicate by Dan Bron, MetaEd Dec 31 '18 at 13:41

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 2
    I have noticed that British people are often more likely to use "have" about certain things where Americans say "take", e.g. walks, baths, breaks. – Michael Harvey Dec 21 '18 at 7:09
  • 1
    Your colleague is right. have is not an idiomatic collocation with walk -- take is. Look up use cases in a good dictionary. – Kris Dec 21 '18 at 7:21
  • 9
    Kris, have is a perfectly idiomatic collocation with walk for a large and significant part of the Anglosphere. – Michael Harvey Dec 21 '18 at 7:35
  • Also see english.stackexchange.com/questions/5976/… – microenzo Dec 21 '18 at 8:29
  • 1
    Yes, no “wow” factor here. Dare I say it’s a somewhat pedestrian question ;-) – Chappo Dec 24 '18 at 12:32
3

Your sentence is grammatically correct.

'To have a walk' is similar to such phrases as 'to have a shower / lunch, etc.

The phrase 'to take a walk' is a synonym of 'to have a walk'.

'To go for a walk' is not appropriate in your case because it is used rather for an intention to walk than a process of walking.

  • 2
    I disagree. To me, 'go for a walk' is synonymous with 'take a walk'. – Kate Bunting Dec 21 '18 at 9:03
  • 2
    This "intention" business, which is not really a rule carved in stone, would have some legitimacy if the suggestion had been: "I was going to go for a walk" Instead, "I was going for a walk" clearly expresses an action in progressive at the time of speaking. The speaker's intention has little to do with it. – Mari-Lou A Dec 22 '18 at 11:58
  • 1
    @Mari-LouA To me, “I was going for a walk when X happened” means that I was just putting on my coat, or on my way out the door – it’s not about intent, but the state of being mid-walk has also not been reached yet. The go bit to me means ‘go out’ or ‘leave’, with for a walk meaning ‘in order to walk for pleasure’, so the present continuous means being in the process of leaving in order to walk for pleasure, i.e., just on the way out the door. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Dec 24 '18 at 0:46
  • 2
    @JanusBahsJacquet it can be either, it can express a decision taken some time in the past "I'm going to go for a walk" or it can anticipate an action, "We were going to have a walk when it started to rain" (about to) – Mari-Lou A Dec 24 '18 at 0:53
  • 2
    To me this has nothing to do with grammatical or not. "Walk" is a noun, you can have it. The question seems to be a semantic or idiomatic one. Can I "have an electron"? When you think about it "take a walk" should be more strange than "have a walk", as "have" can mean to experience something, like have fun, have difficulty, have dinner. cf. "take fun", "take difficulty" "take dinner".. The claim seems pretty arbitrary unless the insistence is that "take a walk" is idiomatic and "have a walk" isn't, in which case all they're saying is that people usually say X instead of Y, in their opinion – Zebrafish Dec 24 '18 at 6:10

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.