1

I have a colleague who insists on inserting "The" into the following sentence ---

"If you're familiar with Johnson City's hip, comfortable The Ellis Hotel, you'll love the new Autograph Collection by Marriot."

The rationale for inserting "The" is that the hotel is persnickety about their name, and my colleague insists on deferring to the hotel's preferred style.

I maintain that the geographic identifier --- "Johnson City's" --- functions as a definite article, thereby making "The" redundant and grammatically incorrect. I.e., we would never write, "If you're familiar with the hip, comfortable The Ellis Hotel, you'll love . . ."

Is this in fact ungrammatical ? Or is it merely bad writing ?

If the former, what specific rule has been violated ?

  • What about "If you're familiar with the epic Western film The Wild Bunch, you'll love..." Would you drop "The" from "The Wild Bunch" because there's already a "the" before "epic"? – Zebrafish Dec 20 '18 at 1:17
  • By the way, I doubt "The" is officially part of their name. This is based on what I've seen on their official website and Wikipedia. – Zebrafish Dec 20 '18 at 2:05
  • "The" is part of the legal name and title of the business, and the whole name and title will stay that way, except in very informal references. Grammar has nothing to do with this. "The" in the name could as well have been any combination of letters for that matter. So, relax! – Kris Dec 20 '18 at 7:05
  • "We would never write, "If you're familiar with the hip, comfortable The Ellis Hotel, you'll love . . ." It does sound awkward, but it's technically grammatical to do so. – Dan Dec 28 '18 at 16:03
2

I see your point, but "The" in "The Ellis" functions as both a definite article and part of a proper noun.

You could say "California's Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson was born in 1972," and (assuming the reader knew the context) "California's "The Rock" was born in 1972."

If the name was "Charlie's Hotel" you would never omit "Charlie's." It sounds better to omit the "The" in the sentence you posted, but based on those two examples I believe it is grammatically incorrect to do so.

  • I think it's just a matter of not naming something by its correct name. Like technically if I said I went to Gambia that probably wouldn't be technically correct because it's officially The Gambia, but I'm not sure it's a grammatical error. – Zebrafish Dec 20 '18 at 1:33
  • Grammar has no role here. – Kris Dec 20 '18 at 7:06
  • Note: It's not "The Ellis" any more than it is "Ellis Hotel", it's "The Ellis Hotel". – 3D1T0R Dec 20 '18 at 19:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.