I am looking for a word that describes a person described in the description of the title.

An example of such a person would be a person who comfortably passes the (easier) qualifiers and gradually performs even better as opponents get tougher in the final stages of a tournament.

The person does not necessarily relax when he knows he can easily win, but "naturally" performs better as the stakes get higher.

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

closed as off-topic by Glorfindel, tmgr, Scott, jimm101, choster Jan 9 at 18:49

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions on choosing an ideal word or phrase must include information on how it will be used in order to be answered. For help writing a good word or phrase request, see: About single word requests" – Glorfindel, tmgr, Scott, jimm101, choster
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • "Progressive" might cover the gradually performing better aspect, but does not necessarily mean they find the early stages easier - it does however suggest that they passed the earlier rounds in order to progress? – Sam Dec 11 '18 at 16:15
  • @Sam but assuming the earlier stages are easier? – ab123 Dec 11 '18 at 16:18
  • 2
    @ab123 - also, "competitive" describes someone who gives a good game against any opponent. I went for progressive as it means "developing gradually or in stages" - it seemed to fit your requirements better if it had to be a single word! – Sam Dec 11 '18 at 16:56
  • Possible/partial duplicate of english.stackexchange.com/questions/304332/… – user3445853 Dec 13 '18 at 11:51
  • 1
    You might not be aware that there are strict rules for single-word-requests: "To ensure your question is not closed as off-topic, please be specific about the intended use of the word. You must include a sample sentence demonstrating how the word would be used." You can add this using the edit link. For further guidance, see How to Ask, and make sure you also take the EL&U Tour :-) – Chappo Jan 6 at 1:00

How about "clutch (player)" per : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clutch_(sports)

Clutch performance in sports is the phenomenon of athletes under pressure, usually in the last minutes of a game, to summon strength, concentration and whatever else necessary to succeed, to perform well, and perhaps change the outcome of the game. It occurs in basketball, hockey, football, esports, and other sports. The opposite is "choking": failing to perform as needed, when under pressure.

  • This can also apply to competitive gaming – GrumpyCrouton Dec 12 '18 at 18:46
  • 8
    You should note this usage is very much American sports slang, not generally-used English. (You can confirm that on Google Trends, it shows the phrase pretty much only exists in the US, as opposed to 'rise to the challenge/occasion'. The bottom line is there is no generally-accepted noun-phrase). Ditto, 'raise your game', and the opposite choke (sports) are also American sports slang. – smci Dec 13 '18 at 0:31

The phrase that describes the act of matching skill/performance according to degree of hardness is "rise to the occasion."

I am not aware of a single word that is synonymous with this concept.

Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.

  • 3
    I like this over "clutch". "Clutch" applies, typically (AmEn here) near the end of some situation. If you're talking generally, I'd go with Rise... For example, "John is a great worker. For years, he's constantly being promoted to tougher positions. However, he's always able to rise to the occasion and get the job done." That fits better than saying "John is a clutch employee, always being promoted...". – BruceWayne Dec 12 '18 at 19:47

I agree with others who have suggested that there may not be a word to describe such a person. But there are words that describe the attitude, or activity.

Let's start from the opposite end. How would you describe the opposite behavior? A person who did more than was necessary could be described as acting excessively. So we need to find antonyms for excessive.

A person who doesn't act excessively might be acting in a way that's moderate, or measured, or conservative, or efficient. These all seem like fine descriptions, each emphasizing a different quality, or reason for non-excessiveness.


We may use the word " COMMENSURATE WITH " and its noun form " COMMENSURATION " but naming the person who does so is rather difficult.

The adjective means corresponding in size, degree or proportion.

We may use a term from mathematics , EXPONENT where the process of using exponent is called raising to a power. However, the expression should be properly worded to hold the meaning.


So I think that "progressive" is the most apt adjective. They could be a progressor, but I do not think that is as accurate as the adjective. There are many words to describe a good sporting competitor, but in terms of your original question you cannot get much better than "progressive" as a single word.


A dark horse is a possible description:

Typically, a sports commentator would use this expression when a contender has exceeded expectations at any stage of a competition.

  • Dark horse is negative, like stalking horse. – user3445853 Dec 13 '18 at 11:48

If the difficulty of the situation is due to competition with other people, then the person could be called competitive.

From https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/competitive:

eager to do better than others in an activity, esp. trying to win in a sports activity:

  • 1
    This is not an answer according to our standards here because it contains no reasoning or explanation in your own words. Please read this advice from SE’ss Community Management team and update this with your content. We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed. – tchrist Jan 5 at 21:07
  • 1
    This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition of competitive (linked to the source) and why it's the most suitable word? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-) – Chappo Jan 6 at 1:12
  • Added some more detail. – Pikamander2 Jan 6 at 10:52

protected by tchrist Jan 5 at 21:06

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.